Originally posted by UncleVanya I really think there is a full frame bias
Agree. Probably a range of reasons from we all want it to be better because it's suppose to as well as some technical items to back that up on paper. Changes in technology with something like the accelerator in the KP and K-1 II versus the K-3 II on it's own perhaps makes it harder to distinguish, and what I mean by that is my K-1/K-1 II has always been much better for me in low light than my K-3 II, and I'd attribute that to the sensor/accelerator, but I have a hunch from the sample photos I've seen with the KP, that the distinction becomes less clear. And the to throw out a real curve, I was going through some shots the other day with my Q-S1 and K-1 II, and I was surprised how good the Q-S1 shots were next to the K-1 II - just clicking through them, it wasn't jumping out at me which camera I had used. Bottom line is you can do really nice work with many formats.