K-3 Sample Photos

novsky · 10-10-2013, 06:49 AM

Nice pics and nice model but wow, DA 18-135 is a CA booster ;-)
Good Q at 800ISO, ho much did u push the LR correction noise level ?

jaad75 · 10-10-2013, 06:53 AM

There is no need for NR for such a low ISO and web size pictures.

novsky · 10-10-2013, 07:20 AM

With my K5 i can see diff between 100 and 800ISO without treatment as i can see CA, even on websized image, so it's why i ask if LR was used for this...
Maybe can we have the original size of this one ?

jaad75 · 10-10-2013, 07:29 AM

I have K-5 too. Web size pictures are noiseless up till ISO3200, I don't even consider using NR for web with such a low ISO. And my K-5IIs is almost one stop better than that.

bvg · 10-10-2013, 07:36 AM

Originally posted by novsky

ho much did u push the LR correction noise level ?

That is not my pictures, I have found it at FLICKR

.

novsky · 10-10-2013, 07:51 AM

Noiseless up till ISO3200 ??? are u kidding me ??? v'got the K5IIs too (K10-K7-K5&IIs) and websized (72dpi) ARE noisy and need LR or PS treatment before rendering for the web...Chroma noise is enough visible for my dady....maybe i need to change my glasses or my screen ? ^_^

Anyway, as u said "I don't even consider using NR for web" soooooooooooooo, my question was to Bvg just to compare K3 800 ISO with K5IIs 800 ISO and i will be good to have that image in original size for better compare u're right.

Or maybe wait for DPreview & DxO results, it will be more easy to find out the IQ & Noise

jaad75 · 10-10-2013, 08:03 AM

Originally posted by novsky

Noiseless up till ISO3200 ??? are u kidding me ??? v'got the K5IIs too (K10-K7-K5&IIs) and websized (72dpi) ARE noisy and need LR or PS treatment before rendering for the web...Chroma noise is enough visible for my dady....maybe i need to change my glasses or my screen ? ^_^

Noiseless for a web size. Here you have, just a random one (I meant Luminance NR, I usually leave Color NR on default in Lightroom):

novsky · 10-10-2013, 08:29 AM

Dear Jaad, nice pics.... but a bit noisy (chroma) and at 530X800.... it will be a bit more noticeable at 1000x665 as the Bvg's sample...

Quote:

(I meant Luminance NR, I usually leave Color NR on default in Lightroom)

So u use LR or not to export for the web ? ^_^ I use Chroma NR, depends on what kind of noise have to be corrected........but my web sized photo are usually in 72dpi/3000X?? Can we leave that sterile discus, i'got my opinion u've got yours, that's all.

jaad75 · 10-10-2013, 09:10 AM

Originally posted by novsky

it will be a bit more noticeable at 1000x665 as the Bvg's sample...

Yeah, maybe slightly, but that's two stops higher ISO than his, and his photo was downsampled from 24MPix, so I would expect not even a trace of noise...

Originally posted by novsky

So u use LR or not to export for the web ? ^_^ I use Chroma NR, depends on what kind of noise have to be corrected....

Yes, I export directly from Lightroom, but I rarely use NR other than default, for such a small size. For IIs, I just turn the pre-sharpening off even for higher ISO.

Originally posted by novsky

but my web sized photo are usually in 72dpi/3000X

Yeah, that would require a little bit more careful treatment (BTW, there is no need to give DPI if you're giving pixel size

).

Originally posted by novsky

Can we leave that sterile discus, i'got my opinion u've got yours, that's all.

Alright. EOT.

novsky · 10-10-2013, 03:15 PM

Anyway, love your live/concerts shots Jaad, from K10 to K5IIs... ;-)

jaad75 · 10-10-2013, 04:03 PM

Thanks.

curlednoodles · 10-10-2013, 06:43 PM

Wow the level of detail is impressive!!

Sample Images?K-3 | RICOH IMAGING

**david94903** · 10-10-2013, 09:03 PM

I was thinking great, the release new K-3 will drive down the K-5 IIs price, and I'll pick one up cheap on Cyber Monday. But after seeing those images, I'm seriously rethinking what I'll be getting on Cyber Monday. I think I'll be making room for that new K-3.

rawr · 10-10-2013, 10:32 PM

More K-3 images of the same Japanese model, but by a different photographer, using the FA 77:
PENTAX K-3 test (by prototype) - a set on Flickr

Sample:

StepOne · 10-11-2013, 12:25 AM - **1 Like**

Was looking at the blonde girl photo, cute one, then i did 100% to see details and was shocked! I saw a hairy beast with skin peeling off the nose!

10-10-2013, 07:20 AM	#18
novsky Forum Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 63	With my K5 i can see diff between 100 and 800ISO without treatment as i can see CA, even on websized image, so it's why i ask if LR was used for this... Maybe can we have the original size of this one ? Last edited by novsky; 10-10-2013 at 07:21 AM. Reason: Not finished ^_^

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Pentax K-3 Hands-on and Sample Photos	frank	Pentax K-3 & K-3 II	116	10-12-2013 03:57 AM
Pentax K-50 Sample Photos	Adam	Pentax K-30 & K-50	16	08-19-2013 09:02 PM
Pentax K-5 IIs First Impressions, sample comparative photos	Adam	Pentax K-5 & K-5 II	89	10-31-2012 03:45 AM
Pentax k-5 IIs - Are sample gallery photos coming?	Racerdew	Pentax K-5 & K-5 II	16	10-02-2012 11:12 AM
White K-01 unboxing and sample photos	rjm	Pentax K-01	4	03-24-2012 02:08 AM

10-10-2013, 06:49 AM	#16
novsky Forum Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 63	Nice pics and nice model but wow, DA 18-135 is a CA booster ;-) Good Q at 800ISO, ho much did u push the LR correction noise level ?

10-10-2013, 06:53 AM	#17
jaad75 Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Cracow Posts: 457	There is no need for NR for such a low ISO and web size pictures.

10-10-2013, 07:29 AM	#19
jaad75 Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Cracow Posts: 457	I have K-5 too. Web size pictures are noiseless up till ISO3200, I don't even consider using NR for web with such a low ISO. And my K-5IIs is almost one stop better than that.

10-10-2013, 07:36 AM	#20
bvg Veteran Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: Queensland, Australia Photos: Albums Posts: 340	Originally posted by novsky ho much did u push the LR correction noise level ? That is not my pictures, I have found it at FLICKR .

10-10-2013, 07:51 AM	#21
novsky Forum Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 63	Noiseless up till ISO3200 ??? are u kidding me ??? v'got the K5IIs too (K10-K7-K5&IIs) and websized (72dpi) ARE noisy and need LR or PS treatment before rendering for the web...Chroma noise is enough visible for my dady....maybe i need to change my glasses or my screen ? ^_^ Anyway, as u said "I don't even consider using NR for web" soooooooooooooo, my question was to Bvg just to compare K3 800 ISO with K5IIs 800 ISO and i will be good to have that image in original size for better compare u're right. Or maybe wait for DPreview & DxO results, it will be more easy to find out the IQ & Noise

10-10-2013, 08:03 AM	#22
jaad75 Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Cracow Posts: 457	Originally posted by novsky Noiseless up till ISO3200 ??? are u kidding me ??? v'got the K5IIs too (K10-K7-K5&IIs) and websized (72dpi) ARE noisy and need LR or PS treatment before rendering for the web...Chroma noise is enough visible for my dady....maybe i need to change my glasses or my screen ? ^_^ Noiseless for a web size. Here you have, just a random one (I meant Luminance NR, I usually leave Color NR on default in Lightroom):

10-10-2013, 08:29 AM	#23
novsky Forum Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 63	Dear Jaad, nice pics.... but a bit noisy (chroma) and at 530X800.... it will be a bit more noticeable at 1000x665 as the Bvg's sample... Quote: (I meant Luminance NR, I usually leave Color NR on default in Lightroom) So u use LR or not to export for the web ? ^_^ I use Chroma NR, depends on what kind of noise have to be corrected........but my web sized photo are usually in 72dpi/3000X?? Can we leave that sterile discus, i'got my opinion u've got yours, that's all.

10-10-2013, 09:10 AM	#24
jaad75 Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Cracow Posts: 457	Originally posted by novsky it will be a bit more noticeable at 1000x665 as the Bvg's sample... Yeah, maybe slightly, but that's two stops higher ISO than his, and his photo was downsampled from 24MPix, so I would expect not even a trace of noise... Originally posted by novsky So u use LR or not to export for the web ? ^_^ I use Chroma NR, depends on what kind of noise have to be corrected.... Yes, I export directly from Lightroom, but I rarely use NR other than default, for such a small size. For IIs, I just turn the pre-sharpening off even for higher ISO. Originally posted by novsky but my web sized photo are usually in 72dpi/3000X Yeah, that would require a little bit more careful treatment (BTW, there is no need to give DPI if you're giving pixel size ). Originally posted by novsky Can we leave that sterile discus, i'got my opinion u've got yours, that's all. Alright. EOT.

10-10-2013, 03:15 PM	#25
novsky Forum Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 63	Anyway, love your live/concerts shots Jaad, from K10 to K5IIs... ;-)

10-10-2013, 04:03 PM	#26
jaad75 Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Cracow Posts: 457	Thanks.

10-10-2013, 06:43 PM	#27
curlednoodles Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Far North Qld, Australia Posts: 184	Wow the level of detail is impressive!! Sample Images?K-3 \| RICOH IMAGING

10-10-2013, 09:03 PM	#28
david94903 Loyal Site Supporter Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: San Rafael, CA Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 806	I was thinking great, the release new K-3 will drive down the K-5 IIs price, and I'll pick one up cheap on Cyber Monday. But after seeing those images, I'm seriously rethinking what I'll be getting on Cyber Monday. I think I'll be making room for that new K-3.

10-10-2013, 10:32 PM	#29
rawr Veteran Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 11,913	More K-3 images of the same Japanese model, but by a different photographer, using the FA 77: PENTAX K-3 test (by prototype) - a set on Flickr Sample:

10-11-2013, 12:25 AM - 1 Like	#30
StepOne Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Botosani Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 285	Was looking at the blonde girl photo, cute one, then i did 100% to see details and was shocked! I saw a hairy beast with skin peeling off the nose!