Originally posted by Parallax Okay, I'm going to say is something here that I wouldn't dare say in any other thread.
I've looked at pictures here, and in other threads, taken with a K-1 and I swear they look different. Sharper? More 3d? I can't put my finger on it, but they just look different; in a positive way.
Well, I think you are right, in particular with the FF shots. After all, FF is a different ballgame. For my shots, which are almost all crop shots so far, they are basically K5IIs shots that are shot with the K1. Except.....better and faster focus, more accurate....better by far high ISO IQ....and perhaps a different processing engine in the K1 that also makes a difference?
I get a lot better detail with the K1 than I have before...and the shots come much easier with fewer deletes. It is probably a combination of factors, but I do agree the K1 shots are more magical in many cases.
Adversarialy ....We are seeing a lot of very fine glass used with the K1 by some... which is going to reflect in the IQ seen here considerably. I keep in mind that what we see on the web is seldom a true reflection of how a shot might print. Large printing for the K1 should be a dream.
Look at his head....pretty decent detail for a Bigma lens. I do see a difference when mounted on the K1.
At 1/160 handheld f8 ISO 640 @ 500mm.......I won't complain.
---------- Post added 05-14-16 at 09:20 PM ----------
Originally posted by RoxnDox Was that in Otis territory by chance?? Might have to swing your K-1 as a club if you go in there...
No way I would linger in Otis territory! It is damn scary in there.