Originally posted by Racer X 69 The land belongs to Mother Earth. Even our homes and businesses are built from that which our Mother Earth provides. Therefore, no man can own any of it.
I have heard the argument that, although the First Nations were living on the land that is now the United States, they had not "done something" with it, and thereby had no claim to control or ownership. He stated and believed that this was a "basic principle" recognized universally by all nations through all time.
On the other hand, if it is true that the First Nations regarded land as something that could not be owned, it is curious that so many tribes identified "our" hunting grounds that could not be used or intruded upon by neighboring tribes. According to one account I read of the Lewis and Clark expedition, one of the most regular requests from the tribes they encountered was for firearms and assistance to deal with neighboring tribes who were making incursions onto "our" land. So it seems that the concept that the land belongs equally to all and to no one person applies only within "our people" and does not extend to all people = not to NPLU. Also, if the land cannot be "owned," then how can it be "taken away?" It's a thorny issue, nothing like black-and-white.