Originally posted by Parallax Or, as Yogi Berra would put it, "déjà vu all over again."
It is the same, only different: such as the names of the actors or the place or the juxtapositions with other things. But the underlying drives in people remain the same. So, nothing new under the sun.
---------- Post added 04-02-17 at 03:47 PM ----------
Originally posted by Rupert Yep, been there many times in the 60s.....crazy place....scantily clad girls.....oh yeah, plenty of them! I never could take more than about 30 minutes of the place....too loud.. too many very weird people. In the video the same weird people are there....just older! It is documented that the Secret Service did some partying there the night before Kennedy was shot.....heard they were real party animals? It wasn't in a cellar or basement, it was upstairs. What I recall most insane was a dude trying to ride a Norton up the stairs and it flipped over on him and some other people. Fortunately he was the only one seriously injured. I would never even consider letting my Triumph into a place like that.
Documentary about Fort Worth's legendary Cellar Nightclub in the works - YouTube What was the evidence of the Secret Service, a bevy of fat middle aged men wearing dark suits with bad enough hearing impediments that they needed hearing aids?
---------- Post added 04-02-17 at 03:53 PM ----------
Originally posted by bertwert I just don't get this...
Mr. X was sentenced to life imprisonment for x reason, to which another five years was added for x reason.
So... the corpse has to stay in prison for five years after death...
That makes a bit more sense (although it does clog up the prison with bodies that cause no danger to the public at large so long as placed appropriately, decreasing capacity for for new criminals). What makes less sense is person is convicted of X and Y. The penalty for X is x years and the penalty for Y is y years, to be served concurrently. You ever tried going to the car showroom and saying I I'll buy that one and the one over there, and pay for them concurrently (with one bag of money) and tell the salesperson to have fun counting the money twice. Why not be honest and say: convicted of X and Y, the time inside is z years, without pretence at itemisation, which is kind of like the shop that sells stuff, two for $w, but they are not available separately.
---------- Post added 04-02-17 at 03:55 PM ----------
Originally posted by Parallax That's absolutely true.
It's also a statistical probability that if your parents didn't have children, you likely won't either.
Mr Mod, permission to speak sir, if your parents didn't have children you won't be.
---------- Post added 04-02-17 at 03:56 PM ----------
We are getting near to 35,000 posts now.