Originally posted by Racer X 69 Some of the fish and chip [places here have them the way you do. We have a regional place, Ivar's, that started out as a walk up on the Seattle waterfront, and after Ivar passed has evolved into the regional chain of dine in/take out fish, chips and chowder. Pretty good, and one I will make an exception for on my list of prohibited junk/fast food.
Also, another regional restaurant/pub, The Buzz Inn, has fries that way if you chose, or more American fries that are cut a bit fatter than the junk food variety, and from washed, but not peeled potatoes. Either go very well with a bacon (cheddar) cheeseburger on a sourdough hard roll, and a beer. I get tartar sauce to dip the fires in (I abhor ketchup).
I applaud Ivar's and The Buzz Inn for their cultural and culinary breadth. There is hope, indeed
Originally posted by Racer X 69 While eating at whatever greasy spoon of the day I was at when driving trucks, many places offered the fries like your chips, calling them home fries. But they aren't really good unless they get the outside a darker golden brown crispy, and the inside fluffy.
That is how all fires should be done.
Dark golden brown outside, fluffy light inside.
Not pale yellow barely crisp outside and mush inside.
Yuk.
Without wanting to denigrate any individual style of cooked potato product, this is where I must respectfully take mild issue...
I will preface my claim by stating that I like fries with a crispy golden outer and fluffy, lighter inside. Many restaurants here serve them (of widely-varying quality, it must be said), and should folks be unwise enough to buy what we call "oven chips" (pre-prepared chips for defrosting and heating in the oven at home), that's the style they typically aim for - although the flavour, to me, is nothing like a British chip or proper American "French" fry. Whatever the bag might have written on it, though, these are fries of a kind,
not proper chips.
The traditional British fish-and-chip-shop chip - which is identical to those my Mum made at home, and her Mum before her - is an entirely different affair. Typically, I'd say it's a half-inch-per-side square-cut chip except for those taken from the edge of the potato (though size and shape can vary somewhat) and deep-fat-fried just
once - ideally in beef dripping, but lesser establishments might use any number (and age
) of vegetable oils - resulting in an exterior that is golden, perhaps edging into lightly-browned,
not crispy (though some minor surface resistance is typical), with an inside that looks like the centre of a freshly boiled or baked potato and has almost the same texture, but ever-so-slightly softer. Not quite al dente, but not soft and fluffy either.
Many lesser fish-and-chip shops (and even some allegedly better ones) now serve thick cut fries rather than traditional chips, and I don't mind them. Actually, I quite like them if they're of good quality and nicely cooked. But they're not proper British chips.
I'm not suggesting any one style is
better than the other... but, rather, my
preference for the food-stuff of my youth, our original national interpretation of it. Just like I
prefer Heinz Salad Cream as a sandwich dressing rather than the continental and American preference for mayonnaise (which I also like)