Originally posted by stevebrot I read on another thread that the K-3 sensor has sub-optimum performance for red at ISO 6400 and that should be a deal breaker. Now I am really confused. All this time and I thought I should not buy the K-3 because of the Ricoh label on the back.
Please advise...I am soooo confused...
Steve
Stay focussed…. if you go into the store without the proper focus, the salesman may talk you into a K-3 with Ricoh on the back… or a Pentax with more badness at 6400 ISO. Pick one to be your main issue and the other to be your fall back issue… I have to say, although which issue is more important is not exactly clear. For some of us ISO at 6400 is prohibitively bad on every camera we've ever seen. Once it gets beyond a certain level of bad, more badness doesn't make any difference, well to some of us, anyway. Some of us excel at differentiating levels of badness. Sort of "badness" connoiseurs if you will. Experts on how bad is bad? I hear they have special grey rooms so they can pick out every nuance of badness. The trouble is, once you become a connoisseur, you can convince yourself some levels of badness are actually good, like because the ISO is 6400 or some other qualifying feature you have to be a connoisseur to appreciate.
Some of us are real simpletons… and bad is just bad.