[jatrax]

All Disney food seems to be made from cardboard, regardless of any flavorings that they attempt to apply to it.

The last time I was at Disney, I learned to not eat Disney food.

Strange how a company that gets so many things right, manages to get food so wrong. Have not been back in years but I always enjoyed the visits when the kids were young. Lots to see, lots to photograph. But what a horrible experience food wise.

Its sad to see a company fail to deliver good cheese.....

[stevebrot]

Its sad to see a company fail to deliver good cheese...

Yep even the Mac 'n Cheese in the kids meal is nasty.


Steve

[dansamy]

Well, there is good food at Disney. But apparently not at Germany pavilion.

[jac]

You chaps should try igunaq. Tastes a lot like blue cheese. What you do, is catch a walrus. Carefully cut the neck and rear end and legs, retaining a sack-like skin bag. Bone out the meat and stuff it in the sack, tying-off/sewing-off all openings. Bury this under large rocks for at least a few months to ferment (and so the polar bears don't get at it first). Unwrap and enjoy the feast! But don't eat too much at once or you're liable to get a touch of indigestion.
Maybe that's how Disneyworld makes its cheese. They're very interested in the natural world, so I understand.

[Parallax]

But don't eat too much at once or you're liable to get a touch of indigestion.

I've always said I'll try any food that I know is safe to eat, and I would even try that if I had the chance. However, just judging by your description of it, I doubt that however much of it I ate would stay down long enough to cause indigestion.

[stevebrot]

Maybe that's how Disneyworld makes its cheese.

Or how Ricoh made the K-3?


Steve


(...must not lose sight of the OP's intent...)

[stevebrot]

More on igunaq...

http://www.nmto.ca/sites/default/files/igunaq.pdf


And who said this thread was all silliness?


Steve

[jatrax]

I am totally amazed at what I have learned from this thread. Some of it has even been useful (though at the moment I'm not sure which bits), but I am sure some of it must have been useful. However, I'm not sure the igunaq part will be. Not positive of course, just doubtful.......

It doesn't sound that bad, except the walrus part.

[Joel B]

(...must not lose sight of the OP's intent...)

OK: "BABY WANT'S HIS BOTTLE!!!!! WAAAAA!!!!" That better?

[Pioneer]

It sounds like another of those diet fads where the benefits of eating the stuff have to be heavily emphasized (and perhaps even exaggerated a bit) to convince people that it is really good for them.

[jatrax]

as long as it says Pentax on the front of the camera I'am happy.

Just to keep my perspective on this thread I went back and read the OP. I have no idea why, bored waiting while images upload. At any rate, I feel good now, I just checked and the k-3 does indeed still say "Pentax" on the front. So I'm happy and I guess the OP is happy as well. (missing, but happy)

Oh well, back to work.........

[Parallax]

Just to keep my perspective on this thread I went back and read the OP.

Rember though, the OP as it stands is the edited version. The original post simply said: "I have been waiting for the announcement of the k3 for some time.Now that the camera is out and seeing the pics and seeing "ricoh on the back of the screen turns me off.Only a matter of time before we see Ricoh on the front of the camera.I think ricoh just shot themselves in the foot." A very verbose version of "Pentax is doomed!"

[Pioneer]

Rember though, the OP as it stands is the edited version. The original post simply said: "I have been waiting for the announcement of the k3 for some time.Now that the camera is out and seeing the pics and seeing "ricoh on the back of the screen turns me off.Only a matter of time before we see Ricoh on the front of the camera.I think ricoh just shot themselves in the foot." A very verbose version of "Pentax is doomed!"

You mean it isn't doomed? Fine time to bring that up. I was just starting to enjoy this goodby feast.

[stevebrot]

Rember though, the OP as it stands is the edited version. The original post simply said: "I have been waiting for the announcement of the k3 for some time.Now that the camera is out and seeing the pics and seeing "ricoh on the back of the screen turns me off.Only a matter of time before we see Ricoh on the front of the camera.I think ricoh just shot themselves in the foot." A very verbose version of "Pentax is doomed!"

I wish there was some way to emphasis the wording of the original post. The edited version simply does not capture the eloquent bluntness of the original.


Steve

[Parallax]

I wish there was some way to emphasis the wording of the original post.

Well, there is, but I don't think it would be appropriate for me to do it.