Originally posted by savoche Ah, but there's still some resistance left in me!
Actually, per kg that K200/2.5 is a lot cheaper than a K-3. Which is why I won't get a K-3.
And no hociR! Saves me a lot in tape, too.
Well, If we pay by the pound, then the smallest lenses cost the least. Doesn't work that way, i.e. Limited line. But if we pay by the desire, same result. So maybe Pentax should price all lenses based on another metric: the highest LBA score = lowest price (complete reversal of micro-economics cost calculation). But I, IMHO as a Grumpy Old Man, would enjoyll owning and using some lenses that are "Too Freaking Expensive!"
So Pentax does not charge by the pound. Does not charge in reverse by Demand (i.e. like all mtgs, they must max out sales and profit for shareholders). All that is left is to Refuse to Buy a K3.
Maybe the K3 will go on a diet?