Regardless of what people think of lawyers, the simple fact is that the imperfect conflict resolution principles of the legal system prevent, blood feuds, murders over disputes, and all manner of "honour saving "crimes. Courts have replaced duelling, in many simple arguments and have a much lower casualty rate. IN fact the very notion that the best shot should be the victor in every dispute is pretty much repugnant. I tell as many lawyer jokes as the next guy.... but there are a heck of a lot of people who forced issues before the courts because they were inflexible pigheaded and too stubborn for their own good and instead of thanking the lawyers for saving them from the street justice prevalent in so many countries around the world, in which they had a 50/50 chance of being dead, they blame the lawyer, for their bad judgement in launching the case.
Just my two cents worth.
I blame the lawyers for not doing more for me in my two divorces, but they didn't marry the women, I did.
If you put your well being in the hands of the courts, don't expect some lawyer to save you. He can mount the best defence in the history of justice, and you can still lose. SO which one of you would be the idiot? The one who fought the case, or the one who launched it?
Last edited by normhead; 05-15-2015 at 12:00 PM.