Originally posted by THoog The five elements of embezzlement: (i) the fraudulent (ii) conversion (iii) of the property (iv) of another person (v) by the person who has lawful possession of the property.
v) Lawful possession: The critical element is that the embezzler must have been in lawful possession of the property at the time of the fraudulent conversion, and not merely have custody of the property. If the thief had lawful possession of the property, the crime is embezzlement. If the thief merely had custody, the crime is larceny.
I think it could go either way, depending on jurisdiction and how the court interprets "lawful possession" of the money - whether the clerk had "lawful possession" or merely custody. Reading the Wiki articles, it might be a case where if the manager pocketed the two dollars, it would be embezzlement, but for the clerk, it would be larceny. North Carolina muddies the waters with a crime called "larceny by employee".
Witch! Burn the witch!
Oh, you're not a lawyer? Sorry...
Originally posted by THoog Yes - and also to find out if French feet are bigger than English feet. We need to know!
Don't know about French feet in general but, probably from the stamping of grapes for the cheap Bordeaux wines, the feet in that area are 357.214mm (roughly 14.06354331 imperial inches). Those feet are, quite literally, dwarfed by the feet of Cremona, Austria. They somehow found out that feet were 480mm (18.9") long. I wonder what
they were drinking at the time...
The different German cities all had different definition of a foot - and while most divided those feet into 12 inches, some chose 10 or 11(!) as a more sane divisor.