Originally posted by Racer X 69 You can't deny that which we all do.
We do it all day long, and even while we sleep.
A quart or more each day, every last one of us.
We need to capture all that methane and put it to good use heating homes and businesses, maybe even generate steam to turn turbines that generate electricity. Think of the industry that would spring up. People to manufacture the devices for capture of the gases, stores where one could purchase said devices, services that would collect the 'product', utilities that would generate and distribute the energy.
Collection devices could also be developed for cattle. Livestock are the single largest emitters of methane worldwide.
The impact in the economy would be quite positive, I'd venture to say.
Certainly not a pursuit of primary school boys.
We do it, the primary school boys seem to have an obsession with talking about it. Therein is a difference.
The rest of your post about capturing it seems to be predicated on the idea that the proper way to use energy is electricity distributed through the grid after being generated somewhere else. That is, something which is made available for sale by one of the current suppliers. I have noticed this thinking in relation to solar power too. Must be converted to electricity to distribute for use in stand alone plug in appliances.
Why do we not think of a fridge as part of the house.
In summer powered by an absorption type chiller with the hot side outside in a panel catching the sun, the refrigerant piped to the cold cupboard inside, and in winter, when outside air is cold enough use that cold air piped into the house to chill the cold cupboard, and if it is cold enough this would even work for the freezer. So some of you guys would have virtually zero cost fridges for some months of the year. And have a relatively conventional arrangement, perhaps using the same equipment, for the times when pure thermals effects are not good enough. The fridge would then be three separate parts, which could be replaced separately - the cold cupboard, the outside kit, and the plumbing between them.
I have thought, during winter how ironic it is that I pay for gas to warm the house, including the kitchen where the fridge is. Then I pay for electricity to cool the fridge down to a temperature like it is outside for most of the winter. The only advantage is that the waste heat discharged by the fridge is delivered to my house and so slightly reduces the gas needed to get it to thermostat temperature.
Who loses in this model? The house removalists, who no longer need to shift the fridge, a significant volume of stuff for which they will no longer be able to charge for shifting.