Originally posted by StiffLegged String is a very important thing.
Rope is thicker,
But string is quicker.
(Spike Milligan)
Does Spike rank as sufficiently nutty? Or does a field of theoretical physics hypothesised over for, oh, thirty years at least without experimentally testable results or a coherent prediction or two, rank as thoroughly nutty? My money's on the late Mr Milligan.
I didn't know that Spike was a string theorist, but his "theory" does look more sound than the other kind
Oh, and the more I read about MOND theories the less convincing they look. Most seems to require gravity to travel more slowly than light, and well, it doesn't.
But hey, what do I know. I'm no more a physicist than I'm a physician.