Originally posted by jeffshaddix Should be interesting either way - I expect the DP2M to win at low ISO, though I'm sure the K-3 will win past ISO 800. Still, perhaps a B&W comparison at ISO 1600 would be fun!
On a side note, I'm considering a DP1M as a wide-angle sidekick to my K-5iis; since I see you have the DP1M as well, have you ever compared it against your K-5 plus a 21ltd or similar? Thanks!
The X3 sensor produce images that are very detailed and seem to reproduce luster very well.
To come close my DP1m, I'd need a 2-3 pano stitch image from my K30+DA15ltd and then down sized to 16mp.
From fooling around with the K3 (sample#1), I think its really good but DP1m is better for IQ.
I used the word 'fool around' as that's what it is atm w/o actual raw files and 1vs1 shots.
The lack of AA filter already allows the K3 to capture fine details on the leaves and moss, which often a AA-filtered camera will smudge.
But in the end, DP1m is only ever going to be 28mm eq.
Its not going to be as versatile (far from it)
Above ISO200 and its advantage goes away.
Shadows can't be pulled much.
13s per file write (but buffer allows about 7 shots)
Totally not the same AF speed.
So comparing the two, well....I don't know if its that fruitful.
One gets a good shot all the time.
The other gets very good shots when used right when the situation is controllable.
Specialist vs generalist.
My few cents.
Last edited by pinholecam; 10-14-2013 at 05:16 AM.