Originally posted by Franc see exif, kingfisher was taken with the da*300
Ya can't BEAT that DA* 300! With limited funds, I started off with the DA* 16-50, and when I had the $$$ for a second DA* lens, the DA* 300 was the one I chose. Unless I just get FLUSH with cash, I doubt I'll ever buy any of the others except maybe the DA* 55 F1.4. I already have a 100mm F2.8 and an older FA 135 F2.8 from the 90s, so I don't see the purpose in spending that kind of money on the 50-135, nor spending what it costs to get the F2.8 200, when I could get a Tamron F2.8 70-200 for less than that... Same with the 60-250... I know its reputation is TACK SHARP, but so is the 300, and it's another 50/75mm. I have the 55-300 and an 18-250 if I want that range of zoom... nowhere near the quality, but when I want quality at a distance, that's what the 300's for. When my K-3 gets here, I'll almost ALWAYS have the 300 on that, probably the D FA 100 on my K-5 and my 55-300 or my Sigma 18-250 on my K-30... Just have to get something like a Cotton Carrier to carry it all, so I can get shots like Alan did without banging my cameras and myself to death, lol.
Oh, by the way, Alan... GREAT SHOTS! I could have been flipping through National Geographic or Audubon and not seen any better!
Jeff