Originally posted by Mazhe If I had to accuse them of bias, it would be rather toward Olympus. C/N product can get a bit of bashing, especially when they do compare them to u4/3 or even other mirrorless. And when they get praised, you cannot say it is not deserved: they do some good stuff, or else models above entry would never sell.
I agree. I think they're favorable toward Pentax too. I even suspect at least one them uses Pentax as his personal camera. It's only been recently they've lagged behind on the Pentax DSLR reviews - particularly the K-5 II and IIs. But let's face it - on the surface (and on the spec sheet) it looks like they offer little new over the K-5, so I can partly understand the review being de-prioritized. Nevertheless, the few changes made for a significant and worthwhile upgrade for many of us (like myself).
I believe the last thing DPR wants to see is an industry with only Nikon and Canon in it. Thus they spend a lot of effort and time giving coverage to Olympus, Fuji, Pentax, and Sony, as well as Panasonic and others. Pentax is getting less coverage because they've released fewer products to cover. Olympus and Fuji have been releasing more lately, and Sony's been on a product release rampage the last 2 or 3 years.
Originally posted by JimmyDranox Olympus has launch a very aggressive PR campaign, not only on DPReview, but in stores as well. And in this field, Ricoh is very far behind. That's the problem. In this world, an exceptional product will not count if is not known by many people.
I've heard that product review sites have practically had to beg Pentax for kit to review, and still they'd get put off for months sometimes. Other companies seek reviewers out and practically push the products on them. Pentax, being thin on staff, have failed to hire people to concentrate on this. And yet, in reality, it's one of the most important positions in the company. Hopefully Ricoh is changing this.