Originally posted by stevebrot I agree. Why swap one potential point of failure for two? In addition, each point of contact presents potential for signal degradation and lower speed. I might also mention that all better quality cards have lifetime warranty.
Steve
Lifetime warranty... yes, most of my cards have that, and I have never once claimed the warranty, cause shipping costs would almost pay for a new card... And the fault usually results in it not working in some card readers, but still working in others, so they might reject the warranty claim.
The reason why I do this experiment is because the microSD cards themselves are very solid... it's really just a bit of thick, hard to break PCB it seems, no plastic bits that can break away. And they are cocooned in a cheap adapter, which, if broken, can be easily replaced. The SD cards that have fallen apart seem to be much flimsier inside the plastic casing... I'll have to open up one at some point...
Actually it would be kind of cool if a camera came with a microSD slot, or two, plus a couple of storage slots so you won't lose them. The only major advantage of SDs is that they are harder to lose.