Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
12-07-2014, 12:46 AM   #1
Senior Member
Sten's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 103
Reasons (not) to upgrade from K-5 to K-3?

I have a K-5 with the lenses Pentax 18-135 and 55-300 and Sigma 70 mm macro and 10-20 mm f3.5.


I use the 18-135 most of the time, and the 55-300 for animals at distance, and the Sigma 70 sometimes for portraits, and the Sigma 10-20 mm rarely for landscapes.


I take pictures of landscapes, nature, people, animals, street, still life, and other things. I always use raw format and Photoshop CS6 with Adobe Camera Raw (ACR).


I am satisfied with my K-5. The only improvement that I would like to see is in light metering, where the K-5 sometimes misses,
but this is not serious because I can improve the exposure afterwards with ACR. The K-3 has better light metering.


The K-3 has better auto focus than the K-5, but for me the K-5 auto focus works just fine.


I am not sure that more pixels with the K-3 would be an advantage for me, since the 16 Mpixels of my K-5 are quite enough.


The K-3 is a little bigger and weighs more than the K-5 which is a disadvantage.


So an upgrade to the K-3 does not seem motivated to me.


Have I missed something?


Sten

12-07-2014, 01:11 AM   #2
Forum Member
xabolcs's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Wild-Nord-East Hungary
Photos: Albums
Posts: 72
If You satisfied with the K-5, was not worth change to K-3
12-07-2014, 01:39 AM   #3
Site Supporter




Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,391
Based on my own experience the main improvement is AF (especially in low light). If you are happy with your K-5 there is no need for an upgrade.
12-07-2014, 01:57 AM   #4
Pentaxian




Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Sydney
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 442
This is one reason DSLR sales are plummeting. Improvements are now incremental rather than dramatic. I can't imagine upgrading from my K5 unless it breaks. But this is from a photographer who is not a professional and who is unlikely to out resolve his camera.

12-07-2014, 03:25 AM   #5
New Member




Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 20
I am pretty satisfied with the K5 as well. I would really have use of better low light af but that alone is not enough for me to consider upgrading.
12-07-2014, 03:48 AM   #6
Site Supporter




Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Gladys, Virginia
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 16,237
There is no reason to switch if you are satisfied. There are a lot of incremental improvements over the K5, but nothing earth shattering, both are very capable cameras.
12-07-2014, 03:50 AM   #7
Senior Member
Sten's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 103
Original Poster
Thank you all!
It is good to see that your feelings in this matter are about the same as mine.

Sten
12-07-2014, 05:39 AM   #8
New Member




Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 3
Jonah

I have a K5 and K5iis - both good cameras, but I have traded the K5 in for a K3, mainly for the reason that you can control the camera from your smartphone which is helpful to overcome the lack of articulated screen. Otherwise, the K5 is a perfectly good camera from my point of view.

12-07-2014, 10:05 AM   #9
Pentaxian




Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,457
You havent missed a thing !
Stay where your at.
A switch would/might require a bit more effort at reducing noise on the K3 at ISO above about 600....... either through PP or camera settings.
I personally would say I wish the sensor was not above 20-22 MP on the K3......but it isnt.
Im eyeballing a K5II once again after getting a naughty copy last year.
If it is working for you , and its not broken....."Dont Fix It" !
Just bought the K3 and still undecided if it was the right choice for me ?
12-08-2014, 12:13 AM   #10
Senior Member
Sten's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 103
Original Poster
Thank you for your views!

Hi Jonah and az1895,


Thank you for your views!


I think that az1895 is right: The K-5 works fine for me and I am happy with it, so let it be!


Sten
12-08-2014, 11:32 AM   #11
Veteran Member
magkelly's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 5,905
Money is the main reason for me, why I chose the K-30 over the K-3 actually. I just didn't need half the new features on the K-3 and it was a lot more expensive. If the K-5 works for you then keep it. K-3's are getting cheaper but still they're not inexpensive and that's reason enough I think not to upgrade right now if you already have a K-5.
12-08-2014, 12:13 PM   #12
Site Supporter
savoche's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Lowlands of Norway
Posts: 8,671
There's a lot to like about the K-3, but also a few things I prefer with the K-5 - such as better battery life, smaller raw files (the K-3 eats memory cards), and smaller and lighter body (not by much, but I do notice the difference). The main things I like with the K-3: dual card slots (for instant back-up when travelling), usable live view with focus peaking, and smaller focus points (more important than focusing speed for me).

As for resolution I can't see that much of a difference when using the 18-135 or 55-300. The DFA 100, however, really became a new lens with the K-3. I actually use it now

My K-3 tends to colour band a bit at high ISO, say above 12800, something my K-5 doesn't. If I could get a K-3 with the K-5 sensor... Oh, and one more thing; on the K-5 I can assign sensor shift/composition adjustment to the RAW/Fx button - on the K-3 I can't. Not a big thing but it is somewhat annoying.

Anyway, I agree with the crowd - unless you have more money than you need, stay with the trusty K-5.
12-08-2014, 01:01 PM   #13
Pentaxian




Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,457
And yet another thing.....
I shoot alot standing in water , camera just above water , sometimes even neck deep in water !
Im having a really hard time imagining my summer shoots with a K3 hovering above possible certain death with one wrong move !
Is it a better camera than the K30 , K5 , K5II ?
In a way....yes. But then again if it gets dunked ? Guess what I will be buying on Ebay.........a K30 , K5 , K5II.
So Im not sure exactly what my point is to you , but you wont hear me touting the advantages of the K3 at all.
Its a !%@*&# learning and understanding new settings on it (for me) , and unless you shoot Raw and PP everything there isnt much advantage in upgrading .
If you do upgrade....seriously consider the K5II ?
I might catch Pentaxian Hell for saying this......But Im having a bit of buyers remorse for ((Possibly)) making a wrong decision in purchasing the K3 . Not because it isnt a really great camera , but because it ultimately might not fit my needs , style , and technical ability.
I just learned it takes more work to get the best out of it , and that requires more time in PP .....for me anyway.
Ive had it for all of a week , and not real enthused at this point , but rather frustrated and in a quandry......so take it for whats thats worth.
12-08-2014, 01:08 PM   #14
Pentaxian
LFLee's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Western MA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,264
I don't have K-3, but have K5 and K5IIs - I can tell you that images look way sharp without the AA filter in K5IIs compare to K5.
So if you have K5IIs, I wouldn't recommend K-3, but the AA filter-less is probably worth the 'upgrade' if you think K5 images is not "sharp enough".

with the current K-3 price, it is worth the upgrade if you want to stay in APSC, I think. It essentially "upgrade" all your lenses with that AA filter-less tech.
12-08-2014, 01:12 PM   #15
Site Supporter
boriscleto's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Liverpool, NY
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 12,869
Ask again after CP+...
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
animals, auto, camera, dslr, film, focus, im, k-3, k-5, k-5 k-3 upgrade, k3, k30, k5, landscapes, light, pentax k-3, post, purchase, sigma, upgrade, weather
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Upgrade from K-5 to K-3 or Fuji XT1 or Oly EM1 zVratko Pentax DSLR Discussion 34 11-01-2014 11:56 AM
Upgrade from K-5 to K-3 Budster48 Pentax K-5 11 02-04-2014 10:00 AM
K-5 to K-3 - how big an upgrade. ChrisA Pentax K-3 22 11-21-2013 05:32 AM
Wanting to upgrade from K-5 to K-5ii/iis - Have some questions striker_ Pentax K-5 5 11-13-2013 04:34 AM
Would you pay $350 to upgrade from K-5 to K-5II? chesebert Pentax K-5 18 07-16-2013 06:36 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:11 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top