Originally posted by PentaxJax PLEASE STAND UP
In DSLRs I have been fortunate to have owned a great K-r, that is now with another member of this forum, and have enjoyed the learning curve that came with upgrading to a K-5. I love my K-5 so much that looking at the warranty card the other day, I noticed that this in the year it expires and I should get the free service done. I don't know if I want to send it off for this. "if it aint broke......comes to mind.
Am I lucky?
Maybe. Do I always get the exact result I am looking for? Well....No......
But I don't for a minute think its the camera or lens fault! (well, maybe if it was full frame)
I have so far been very happy with all my Pentax purchases. Be it a lens or a body, they just work. I go out in the hot summer days and it all works, I go out at 3 am in the middle of winter in Maryland and stand in a field for a couple of hours with my K-5 doing its thing. It works.
Now I notice the price of a K-3 is so low its hard to pass up, BUT, all I read is headlines with this and that problem. Floppy mirrors and ISO Noise so loud you cant hear yourself think! There is even a review on Amazon that states the shutter is SO MUCH Louder than a K-5?????????
To make a long story short (if its not too late)
If you're HAPPY WITH YOUR K-3
Let us all know!
It does not make sense to worry about the problems (such as mirror flap, ISO noise etc.) on k-3 at the late production cycle (it's been introduced for over a year) unless you are buying used. Would any camera manufacturer keep the production line going without addressing the issue on a broad base?
Anyway, back to the comparing k-3 vs k-5/IIs; I have all three, k-3 is by far the best, with better AF system and better metering system (more accurate) especially under tungsten light condition. I also do not notice any difference in terms of shutter sound, if any, it would less loud than the k-5/IIs.