Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home

Show Printable Version Search this Thread
06-15-2015, 10:55 AM   #1
Loyal Site Supporter
Mikesul's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,657
Excited about K-3II?

Is anyone who has a K-3II excited about the Pixel shift or improved AF-C focusing on their new K-3 II? I am concerned by the lack of chatter on the boards about the new camera. I would really like to try it, especially at the current prices, but there has been so little discussion and even fewer pictures posted that I am concerned it is only a minor improvement over my K-3. Hoping to hear from actual owners and users of the K-3ii! Thanks.

06-15-2015, 11:09 AM   #2
Senior Member

Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 118
That's what my post is about also "K-3ii hands on info needed". I also am surprised at the lack of information about the K-3ii and I haven't gotten any responses to my questions, so maybe it's not selling very well. Adorama already had it for $100 off for just the weekend and then it went back up.
06-15-2015, 11:11 AM   #3
normhead's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Near Algonquin Park
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 25,864
I was on some site yesterday possibly Amazon, I don't remember or maybe it was DPR, in any case it was listed as the 9th best selling camera out of all of them... so I think it's selling pretty well.
06-15-2015, 11:25 AM   #4
Zafar Iqbal's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,167
I just ordered a second K-3 II camerabody :P

I can't say anything about how it is compared to K-3, but the AF and lowlight focusing abilities have been of most concern to me, and I think K-3 II does the job quiet well.

06-15-2015, 11:29 AM   #5
Rickster's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SE Idaho - Rocky Mtns
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 515
I'm excited. Just ordered my K3 II this morning. ;-)
06-15-2015, 12:02 PM   #6
hoopsontoast's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Oxfordshire
Posts: 828
I am, as it still a new toy! Only had it two weeks but done a great deal of shooting. I imagine that its a bit slow on the uptake as I don't think many people with a K-3 would be upgrading to the Mk2 version, and anyone who was not fussed about the pixel shift/built in astrotracer would probably pick up a discounted K3 Mk1.

06-15-2015, 12:05 PM   #7
Veteran Member
starbase218's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Planet Earth, Sol system, Milky Way galaxy, Universe
Posts: 1,117
To be honest, they said the AF was improved on the K-3 compared to the K-5. And it was, but not as much as I'd hoped. It's a bit faster, but it still hesitates before deciding where to focus after the focus has moved. I think it's called the "double-check", which makes it sound like a feature. But if CaNikon don't need it, why does Pentax? It has tracking, but it's almost impossible to figure out when the camera has lost track of your subject because the points are not continuously lit. Going from the K-3 to the K-3 II probably makes even less of a difference.

Pixel-shift resolution is nice, but it only works when you use a tripod. Which in my case is maybe 2% of the time. So it's not that relevant to me.

So I'm not convinced on the K-3 II. Pentax can win me over if they improve the AF substantially (I also posted on the Ricoh engagement forum what I'd like to see improved), and maybe add a flip-out screen, while not increasing the size/weight of the camera. Maybe they can save weight by moving to a carbon body, like the Nikon D750. That's a fullframe camera, but it's actually lighter than the K-3, while still being weather-sealed.

Last edited by starbase218; 06-15-2015 at 12:13 PM.
06-15-2015, 12:19 PM   #8
Paul the Sunman's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,273
The built-in flash of the K3 (mostly for daylight fill-in and off-camera flash triggering) is more use to me than GPS or pixel shift. So I'm not jumping.

06-15-2015, 02:33 PM   #9
Loyal Site Supporter
Mikesul's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,657
Original Poster
Thanks to the owners who have replied. I already have and love the K-3 (i was a very early adopter) so my interest, and I would think that of many other K-3 owners, is in hearing the experience of K-3 II owners with the two main new features. I am beginning to think that there have not been many PF users who have obtained the camera. I almost bit on the Adorama offer.
06-15-2015, 02:48 PM   #10
Loyal Site Supporter

Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,191
I think that the K3-II is pretty awesome stuff. But I also figure that with the full frame coming out in the nest few months some people are waiting so wee what it as to offer. I think that the Adorama sale has a lot of people working the numbers right now. Heck, my wife has even said that I can get the 150-450 if I want and she will help pay for it.
06-15-2015, 04:35 PM   #11
bobbotron's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Ottawa, ON
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,901
I'm excited about it, sounds like a nice incremental improvement over the K3. But I don't have the cash to upgrade at the moment!
06-15-2015, 09:12 PM   #12
Site Supporter
jimr-pdx's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Location: 1hr north of PDX
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,551
The improved SR and possibly panning-friendly SR would get more use from me than pixel-shift - but it sounds fun! I prefer the K-s2 size but the bonuses on the 3-series are hard to overlook. Seems a lot of worry on forum sites about 'slow sales' on the K-3 II but it really is early for a tidal wave of reports!
06-16-2015, 09:19 PM   #13
Senior Member

Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 241
QuoteOriginally posted by Paul the Sunman Quote
The built-in flash of the K3 (mostly for daylight fill-in and off-camera flash triggering) is more use to me than GPS or pixel shift. So I'm not jumping.
This is exactly the reason I jumped on the $675 deal on the K3. I would use the GPS for astro but not willing to give up the flash when I can pick up one of the existing flash mount units. And pixel shift would be nice but I can already print nice 20 x 30 photos without it. So I'll save the $300 on the K3 and put it towards a sigma 150-500 a little later.
06-16-2015, 11:06 PM   #14
Junior Member
dicks's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 36
@starbase218 and @TedW: Same thoughts there. I like the flash option now and then. Also I hardly use a tripod - so pixel shift is of no use to me. With the firmware getting better I personally thing the differences of AF with firmware 1.21 are marginal, if there are any really. No upgrade for me unless the offer gets better.

  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
dslr, k-3, k-3ii, k3, pentax k-3
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Not so excited about photography anymore? GabrielFFontes General Photography 53 10-02-2015 05:19 PM
who is genuinely excited at the K-3ii and the built in GPS Conqueror Pentax DSLR Discussion 31 05-26-2015 06:56 AM
Which lens are you excited about? 6BQ5 Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 52 05-25-2015 06:48 PM
Who else is excited about the 645D 2014? 2351HD Pentax Medium Format 25 03-13-2014 07:39 PM
I am officially excited about the K-7 dugrant153 Photographic Technique 11 05-27-2009 04:57 AM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:40 AM. | See also:, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]