Originally posted by Qwntm Originally posted by biz-engineer Quote For $600, I don't buy your print, I buy a K-3II instead. Fine, I look forward to seeing your work! I will post a schedule of Art Shows I'll be at in 2016, and maybe I'll see you at one.
Sorry, there is a misunderstanding here. I apologize, I did not meant that your photographs are not good. I wanted to say, that if the pixel shift allow to make $600 prints, then the K-3II is definitely worth the money.
I won't travel in the US to expose my photographs beside yours, although in 15 years of digital photography, I do have photographs that could be exposed (some of the most beautiful being 10 Mega pixels...).
First, I not a pro, I do photography during my leisure time. Second, I think that art has nothing to do with pixel-shift, I think that comparing the resolution of two camera systems is more related to engineering than art.
Originally posted by Qwntm I can tell you right now, Full Frame is definitely NOT "still the way to go." Believe that if you want, but my commercial work right now is done with APS-c as a choice over Full Frame. (Pending Pentax's FF release TBD, but no promises things have to be a big improvement over what I'm getting now. Size weight and cost are considerations.)
Sure, I have no doubt that your commercial work is done with APS-c as a choice over full frame
. I look forward to your practical evaluation of the Pentax Full Frame. I afraid that you'll say that the new Pentax full frame is better than K3II pixel-shift
(and normally it will).
Last edited by biz-engineer; 10-11-2015 at 11:54 AM.