Originally posted by reh321 I'm not sure why you need something in the K-3 line to replace K-50. I see the KP as a more than adequate K30/50 replacement.
The KP's ergonomics & other missing flagship features were the deal breaker for me. I've already played around with one & it didn't do nothing for me. There's nothing wrong with it. It's a great camera with slightly better AF, IBIS, & much better IQ for its intended crowd, but I'm not the intended crowd. Heck, I'll even take a K-70 over the KP. I'd rather do a mirrorless camera instead if I was looking at something similar to the KP.
I much prefer the build, speed, feel, & heft of the K-3II. The K-3II feels perfect in my hands. More perfect than the K-50 & the Nikon D7200 that I use at times. My guess is that the K-3II replacement will have far more excellence & win in every respect.