Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
01-15-2019, 07:41 PM   #91
Sorry for all this
Loyal Site Supporter
CharLac's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Ottawa
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 4,646
QuoteOriginally posted by Ash Quote
Although shooting in crop mode on the K-1 gives you a similar frame rate, so there isnít a significant difference there. If you want the FF coverage, youíll have to decide on your priorities. If you want the frame rate and the coverage youíll have to change systems.
<set mode=nosarcasm> Well, I thought the discussion when jumped in was about the K-P and why I would not buy one...it's not worth a sensor to buy that camera. <set mode=reset>

01-20-2019, 07:02 AM   #92
Forum Member




Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Tartu
Posts: 58
K3-III has to have a faster write speed. Both KP and K3 write at around 27mb/s to the cards while cards support minimum write speeds far bigger than that. Waiting for the buffer to clear takes forever right now.
Aside from that, we need better lenses. I feel the DA* lineup are all dinosaurs by now.

A mirrorless body with A9 AF performance would be cool too :P
01-20-2019, 09:58 AM - 2 Likes   #93
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
Merv-O's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Philadelphia
Photos: Albums
Posts: 619
CharLac Having owned a K-3 and a K-3ii, I find the KP Af focus faster, the ISO (effective to 25,000) amazing, and the sensor to be improved over the K-3/ii. Look they're both great cameras b ut until you've actually shot with a KP, you should understand that there is more to life than extra buffer space. The image quality is better than the K-3/ii. Period.
01-20-2019, 10:16 AM   #94
retired sw engineer
Loyal Site Supporter
reh321's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: South Bend, IN, USA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 11,443
QuoteOriginally posted by Merv-O Quote
The image quality is better than the K-3/ii. Period.
In the two months I've owned my KP, I've never filled the buffer; the KP is just right for me, because I have already taken lots of photos at 12800 or higher ISO.

01-20-2019, 10:20 AM   #95
Pentaxian
Site Supporter
normhead's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Near Algonquin Park
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 31,349
QuoteOriginally posted by Merv-O Quote
CharLac Having owned a K-3 and a K-3ii, I find the KP Af focus faster, the ISO (effective to 25,000) amazing, and the sensor to be improved over the K-3/ii. Look they're both great cameras b ut until you've actually shot with a KP, you should understand that there is more to life than extra buffer space. The image quality is better than the K-3/ii. Period.
That you might have to post examples of. Looking at the Imaging Resources files, yes better, but for me, not "purchase a new camera" better. There's better, and there's "I have to have that." better.

A K-3 image. You say the K-P would be better? More likely since this was pulled from more than half way through a 23 shot burst, on a K-P it wouldn't exist.


---------- Post added 01-20-19 at 12:26 PM ----------

QuoteOriginally posted by reh321 Quote
In the two months I've owned my KP, I've never filled the buffer; the KP is just right for me, because I have already taken lots of photos at 12800 or higher ISO.
I wouldn't do that with a K-3, but I also don't know if I'd be happy with your images. In my case, in low light I go out with my K-1. Shooting small birds, I fill the buffer 3-5 times every hour.

I waited 15 minutes for a bird to land on this branch. I have to strike while the iron is hot. And he wasn't there long enough to allow the buffer to clear and resume shooting. It's all about what you shoot. Feel free to recommend the K-P it's great camera, but, it's not for everyone.

I don't think I'm suffering from poor IQ here.

Last edited by normhead; 01-20-2019 at 10:32 AM.
01-20-2019, 11:06 AM   #96
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
Merv-O's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Philadelphia
Photos: Albums
Posts: 619
QuoteOriginally posted by normhead Quote
That you might have to post examples of. Looking at the Imaging Resources files, yes better, but for me, not "purchase a new camera" better. There's better, and there's "I have to have that." better.

A K-3 image. You say the K-P would be better? More likely since this was pulled from more than half way through a 23 shot burst, on a K-P it wouldn't exist.


---------- Post added 01-20-19 at 12:26 PM ----------



I wouldn't do that with a K-3, but I also don't know if I'd be happy with your images. In my case, in low light I go out with my K-1. Shooting small birds, I fill the buffer 3-5 times every hour.

I waited 15 minutes for a bird to land on this branch. I have to strike while the iron is hot. And he wasn't there long enough to allow the buffer to clear and resume shooting. It's all about what you shoot. Feel free to recommend the K-P it's great camera, but, it's not for everyone.

I don't think I'm suffering from poor IQ here.
Understood Norm: but I don't fill up the K-1ii buffer either and word to you: I get great results from my Leica M8 (at 10.3 mp with a 10 year old CCD sensor). I'm talking about the Raw images coming out of the KP...they need less processing and I can work in lower light at a faster speed--creating less noise in the pics and less post-production.
01-20-2019, 11:46 AM   #97
Pentaxian
Site Supporter
normhead's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Near Algonquin Park
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 31,349
QuoteOriginally posted by Merv-O Quote
Understood Norm: but I don't fill up the K-1ii buffer either and word to you: I get great results from my Leica M8 (at 10.3 mp with a 10 year old CCD sensor). I'm talking about the Raw images coming out of the KP...they need less processing and I can work in lower light at a faster speed--creating less noise in the pics and less post-production.
Again an issue I find confusing. I create presets for my post processing. Up to 7 processes with a button click. Maybe I'd only need 5 with a K-P but it would still only be one button click.

On Imagine Resources the K-P at 1600 ISO looks better than the K-3ii at 800 ISO. SO that's definitely an advantage.

Funny how the K-1 at 1600 ISO looks better than the K-1ii at 3200 ISO. Same chip but different result.

In my shooting the jump from my K20D CCD to my 16 MP K-5 CMOS was huge.... I'm not saying I didn't get good images with the K-20D, but I'm not going to claim they were as good as even a K-5, forget about a K-3 or K-3ii.

Last edited by normhead; 01-20-2019 at 11:53 AM.
2 Days Ago - 1 Like   #98
Senior Member




Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: St. Peterburg
Posts: 183
Cheers: I had changed my K-3 to K-1 and quite happy with it. It all depends on your shooting preferences. I NEVER use serial shooting and I very rare use ISO over 800. Resume: I will never change my K-1 either for KP or K-3 III or even K-3 IX!

4 Hours Ago   #99
Sorry for all this
Loyal Site Supporter
CharLac's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Ottawa
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 4,646
QuoteOriginally posted by normhead Quote
Again an issue I find confusing. I create presets for my post processing. Up to 7 processes with a button click. Maybe I'd only need 5 with a K-P but it would still only be one button click.

On Imagine Resources the K-P at 1600 ISO looks better than the K-3ii at 800 ISO. SO that's definitely an advantage.

Funny how the K-1 at 1600 ISO looks better than the K-1ii at 3200 ISO. Same chip but different result.

In my shooting the jump from my K20D CCD to my 16 MP K-5 CMOS was huge.... I'm not saying I didn't get good images with the K-20D, but I'm not going to claim they were as good as even a K-5, forget about a K-3 or K-3ii.
I think that is the crux of the matter; grabbing on to new technology at some point and embracing it. There will always be something better and more expensive. For me, my K-7 was still shooting great pictures. I mean if you pixel peep then yes, at higher ISO values the image is more grainy that the newer cameras. Would that stop me from submitting one of the K-7 shots to a contest or printing it to be framed? Nope. That said, a great deal came along on a K-3ii and I really wanted to jump on board with a newer sensor. Done! So now I have a much better sensor that my K-7 for a really good price. For me, that was a win-win. One day, when my K-3ii is far outpaced my technology, well then it will time for me to make decisions again. Would I take a K-1 if someone threw it at me? Of course I would. :-) But for now, I am a happy hack behind a viewfinder.

All that said, I am still very pumped to see the list of stuff on the next APS-C flagship...
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
buffer, dslr, image, iso, k-3, k-p, k3, kp, pentax k-3, post, shot
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why I won't buy a KP. Sqideyes Pentax KP 113 02-26-2017 02:38 AM
Night Why Why Why eccentricphotography Pentax K-3 Photo Contest 3 06-02-2014 09:36 AM
Burning of the Koran ... ! Why? Why? Why? jpzk General Talk 128 09-14-2010 04:45 PM
Counterfeit SanDisk Extreme III SDHC at Best Buy? Sharkonwheels Pentax Camera and Field Accessories 10 03-12-2009 07:44 PM
There's a reason why Sandisk Extreme III cards are so costly. Vulpix Pentax Camera and Field Accessories 20 05-21-2007 04:50 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:53 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top