Originally posted by reh321 With a product line of K-1 and successors, K-3 and successors, K-70 and successors, Gr and successors, WG and successors, Theta and successors .... Ricoh can satisfy many different needs/tastes.
Except for the usual suspects who will be dissatisfied no matter what, of course
I have a K-5, a K-3, a K-1, a GR, a Theta, and somewhere a predecessor to the WG series (an Optio W30, I think) - and am satisfied with all of them
That said, what I would like to see in a K-3 successor is a K-3(II) body with the flippy screen and high-ISO performance of the KP. That would - for me - be very close to the perfect APS-C camera. Yes, other improvements would be welcome, too, but I find the K-3 to be an excellent camera already.