Originally posted by cartesio If I remember well, Takahashi said they wanted to produce a camera giving the same image quality as a FF one. If they get such a result, I think it is reasonable to choose a comparable price. Being smaller but equally ergonomic or better would be a plus.
I think that this is a very valid comment, and one of the best for
justifying a price near that of the K-1 II. My prediction is that the
K-3 III will sell in the USA for $1400-$1600 USD at places like
B&H and Adorama a year after it comes out.