Originally posted by Bob from Aus Sorry everyone - there is myth and facts. Some of the ideas about handing out food is myth.
There has been some research done on feeding wildlife and most of it shows that harm is not measurable. I've worked in zoos and seen animals being fed a variety of foods. Actually for many birds, bread is a healthy addition.
What can't be distinguished is sick and injured birds actually who survive only because humans are offering food hand outs. So it is relatively common to see such birds looking for handouts.
Where handing out regular food is an issue because it attracts the least desirable animals including rats and mice and what ever feral birds live in the location.
For those who want to panic about a few small morsels being put out, some urban birds (where I live as an example its feral turtle doves) get 50% of their diet from pet food being left outside. We are talking about tons of food each day.
Having said all of that in my film days my longest lens was 200mm. My advice is to look at the birds' behavious and then position yourself. In time you will get your photo (maybe)
From an ethical point of view disturbing nests and nesting and roosting birds is the biggest issue.
Like Bob, when I first became aware of these issues I looked for research on a number of issues, one being bread is bad for birds.... I couldn't find any. There are a lot of people out there disseminating information that just isn't accurate.
And there is a huge amount of hypocrisy on this issue. People actually want to see pictures of un-habituated animals in natural settings. Well that's just nonsense. I spend 4 to 5 weeks in the bush looking every year in areas where animals live, and I don't see any wild animals from closer than 100 meters, and certainly none close enough to photograph. Almost 100% of the animals you see on line are habituated animals. I have a pack of wolves that live in the forest behind my house. IN 6 years we've seen members of the pack maybe 3 times, and usually from great distance. Animals that haven't been fed by humans don't let human get near them. So anytime you are seeing one of my pictures, even those taken deep in the bush, you are seeing images of animals that let me get close to them, because they know humans are harmless, or habituated animals.
Now I don't live out in the west with mountains so a long lens would be a ridiculous idea. There are very few places open enough to use one here. We have forest even on top of our ridges. So, 99% of our wildlife photos are taken along the Highway 60 corridor where animals are used to the noise of cars, or near the campgrounds where people they are poaching human food, whether by being fed or by raiding garbage. Now people will claim this is not natural. There are records of fox, ravens, racoons, possums and wolves hanging around the NA encampments in North Ameraca for thousands of years. The idea of leaving food out for nearby animals is built into North American native traditions. Native Americans, like us, enjoyed encounters with the animals we share the earth with, and the animals are always invited to rituals, and often baiting is part of the ritual. This idea that animals shouldn't be baited is the modern and untested concept.
If you take pictures of wildlife, you go to places where animals are habituated, or where someone is baiting them. If you don't do the baiting. Odds are you just turn up and take the pictures of animals that other have baited, how ethical is that? Ethically is that actually worse than doing the baiting yourself?
There are places where animals go to breed or feed, many people will visit those sites to take pictures. That is often stressful to the animals involved ... how ethical is that?
The simple fact is that many of the animals I photograph are being fed by humans... and some people just feed the animals no matter what you say. The animals usually don't complain. See the Pine Martens pulling garbage like garlic bread out of the bins near the local park, why am I the bad guy if I bring them some food that's actually healthy for them?
I'm not saying you can go around indiscriminately feeding the wildlife. But I am saying that a lot of people are just spouting "new agey" type BS, that makes sense to them, "like don't feed the birds bread", because it sounds like good old folksy common sense. And god knows those stupid birds will just gobble down that poison bread cause they are so stupid they don't know what's good for them. People seem to just make up and disseminate this stuff. And it doesn't make you a nature lover because you follow it. It makes you a sheep in the "we are the true nature lovers" herd.
There simply are no shortcuts. At the end of the day, you have to understand the animals you shoot and do what's appropriate for the situation.
Last year at a put in for a canoe trip...there were ducks. There was small Tiimmy's bun sitting on the dash of my car someone hadn't finished with their lunch. I went back to the truck and got it and was about to feed it to the ducklings, when one of my buddy's ran over yelling don't feed the ducks it's bad for them. So I looked it up on line when I got home. Not one scientific study that says bread is bad for ducks. One biologist who said "The majority of a ducks food shouldn't be bread." He didn't say it was science, it was opinion. But at least a biologists opinion. I've also heard a biologist say turtles are declining in Algonquin Park because people are feeding foxes, too many are surviving the winter and foxes eat turtle eggs. If it wasn't for the fact that he's talking about maybe 20 foxes in a 7,000 kilometre park I'd be inclined to believe him. Biologists are entitled to opinions just like everyone else. But sometimes even a biologists opinion is just an opinion, and I've seen them be dead wrong often enough to put a caution on that. Make them quote their sources. So even if the worst case scenario was true, the majority of those ducks food for the day was not going to be bread. They were going to get one Timmy's bun between the 8 of them.
Now here's the problem, my friend though well meaning , was just incredibly rude. He's caught up in the whole "birder mentality" thing. And next year when we go out, we're going to have a chit chat about what an ignorant idiot he was. I got the impression he had some valid reason for doing what he did. He came over yelling and screaming like a banshee. I thought someone was drowning. I was in panic mode. "Oh my god I almost fed the friggin ducks a piece of bread." Now, I just feel abused. So my advice, in this whole issue is, don't open your bleeping mouth unless you actually know what you're talking about.
If you're going to be near wild animals, learn about them. Learn what to do an not to do. I can tell you why not to feed wolves, and I'll point you to the biologist who explained it to me. But all animals are not wolves. Saying you shouldn't bait animals living near campgrounds who are eating garbage with nutritious food, makes you look like an idiot. And I'll be happy to point that out to you. I tell you, a lot of these do gooders enforcing the "rules" need a serious dose of "what for" doled out to them. Just because you follow someone's bogus animal welfare rules doesn't make you a good person. It only makes you as good as the person who promotes those rules, and from what I can tell, a lot of them are in your face idiots.
My basic rule.... don't feed any animal that's big enough to hurt you. If you feed an animal, he will think you're his buddy. Animals routinely play fight with their buddies. If that animal can injure you in a play fight, you want him ignoring you, not thinking you're his buddy. After that, find out enough about the animals you want to photograph, to make informed decisions about baiting and disrupting their lives. There simply are no shortcuts.
The fact that you sit on your sofa and think about animals, doesn't make you an expert.
As a parting thought, if you share your food with animals because you are human, do you tell people not to because you're inhuman?
Just my two cents worth.
Last edited by normhead; 04-19-2015 at 05:32 PM.