I understand Jim Gaffigan is a comedian?
Anyway, there is a special situation in Germany and some other European countries (which will ease a bit with European Union rules):
The "profession" photographer is seen as a handicraft.
Which means, to work as a professional you need to pass theoretical and practical exams, after a (low payed) apprenticeship of up to 3 years, like for most professions in my country.
But for photographers, there are a couple of gaps in these rules:
Some of them:
- For journalistic photographing, there are exceptions. But you have to be careful what kind of work you really do.
- You can work as an employee of a "real" photographer who is registered with his own business.
- You can work as an official employee for any company which frequently needs photographing for their workflow.
- You can claim you are an artist rather than a photographer, and just have to use a camera as one of your tools; but then you must be very careful what you are doing. If the league of pros think this is a cheat, your case may end up at a court, and a judge will decide whether your work is really "art".
Completely out of question is payed(!) per job work like wedding photography. Any pro (or the tax people!) finding out about this could inform the chamber of professional photographers. If you are caught repeatedly, it could go to court, and also become a financial nightmare.
Whether all this is effecting the grain of truth in Gaffigans post, I wouldn`t know.
I do know that mobile's cameras and digital P&S have radically changed the situation, but, until now, mainly in the area of day-to-day journalism.
Last edited by RKKS08; 11-12-2015 at 12:08 PM.
Reason: Typing