Originally posted by pathdoc On the other hand, if they come to the public park and walk away with nothing but pictures of ducks, dogs and squirrels, they are owed an apology.
While I would agree that, in the current climate, taking photos of children other than your own, in public or otherwise, is likely to result in some form of violence, regardless of your motives, and is therefore not recommended...I am saddened by the modern assumption that doing so must imply some nefarious (probably sexual) ulterior motive. Probably half of HCB's portfolio would have been lost if he'd lived in today's super-paranoid climate - in fact so many of his images involve children he'd probably be dead before long.
The law is the same regardless, in public they may be photographed - indeed they ARE being recorded everywhere they go by CCTV of both private and government ownership, by dashcams, helmet cams, drones, Google, tourists, press. The idea that someone somewhere may find the image of a fully clothed child interesting for the wrong reasons, shouldn't mean that all children must be a no go area for every photographer.