Originally posted by pschlute civil and educated is what this forum excels in.
This is neither civil nor educated.
Perhaps you would do better if you actually commented on the points raised in the video, and made your own arguments about what you see the issues are with regard to mirrorless and Pentax. Then you will get a proper debate. Your opening post comes across as trrolling.
The number of threads I have observed in which a person’s opinion is openly bullied by regulars is overwhelming. If you think that is civil and educated then fine. From my perspective, if someone here doesn’t say “Pentax is great and I have nothing to offer by way of criticism “, then they are viewed as a hater.
As for my opinion, I thought Northrup had some valid points about the direction the industry is taking. Both Nikon and Canon appear to have recognised this and, after resisting Mirrorless for quite a few years, they are now taking action.
What is Pentax doing? They have released 2 cameras in 2 years (the second of which just incorporated tech from the first). I don’t think they have been so quiet for...well...have they EVER been so quiet?
So, with all the major brands now going Mirrorless, will Pentax survive in a shrinking market? I personally believe that their existing customer base will keep them going for a while.
---------- Post added 08-23-18 at 04:15 AM ----------
Originally posted by Wasp I kinda liked the way the Northrups compared Pentax to the old boxing champ. I never knew that Pentax was the biggest 35mm SLR brand back in the sixties. Now a shadow of its former self. It's just a bit sad.
I think that Pentax ignores the MILC market at its own peril. Canon also has some serious catching up to do at the top end of the mirrorless market but at least they have a horse in the race on the consumer side of things.
Thanks for a refreshing opinion. You share my worry, and can see the point of my post.
Yes! Pentax was indeed the heavyweight once. I’m sad too.