Originally posted by jpzk if it is possible to take a picture with a DSLR camera and be able to immediately send it "away" to a remote location
It depends on what your definition of immediate is. There are two parts involved, the first is to save the data as an image file on a recordable medium (such as a hard drive or SD card) and the second is to move the image file to a remote location. Not even smartphones do the initial save to a remote location. It is technically possible to automatically do the second part, but the transfer rate is so much slower than the camera's internal processor that the frame rate would drop to a few frames per minute, not per second. You could save images to JPEG instead of RAW to reduce the amount of data to be transferred, but faster Wi-fi built into the camera draws a lot more battery power and you still can't transfer files as quickly as the camera takes pictures.
if you don't mind cables, some high resolution video cameras send their data directly to off-camera recording devices, but there are other tradeoffs, such as the size and power consumption of the camera, that make this really awkward for applying to a DSLR. The bitrate for these systems is also too high for real-time transfer to a remote network location, so the images are stored locally, just not in the camera. Or if you don't care about resolution, you can set up a webcam hooked up to a mobile device that in turn saves captured images to a network location. Really defeats the purpose of taking pictures with a handheld interchangeable lens camera, though. At a basic level, at what point does quickly sending still images without any review by the photographer become a form of intermittent video?