Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home

Show Printable Version Search this Thread
10-08-2019, 03:11 AM   #16
Site Supporter
Site Supporter

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Gladys, Virginia
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 22,868
The interesting thing with iso 80 on the K5 was that it did provide more dynamic range than the iso 100 setting. Apparently base iso on the K5 was measure at something in the upper 70s by DXO Mark, allowing for a bit lower iso to be allowed. On the other hand, the kx had a base iso of 200 and allowed 100 to be shot but didn't give any more dynamic range.

I guess what I don't understand is what happens with cameras where the base iso is 100 and they allow you to go down to 50. The whole point of extended range is (I think) to allow for longer exposures in strong light, but I guess I don't understand why it doesn't produce way over exposed images.

10-08-2019, 03:15 AM   #17
joergens.mi's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 393
if the native sensor ist capable of handling a lower Iso it would be fine. If the extended ISO is only a divide by x of the base Iso in the camera, with the risc of overexposing in the highlights it's useless, there is a ND Filter better. It there is a good technical solution for that it would be fine if ist is a simple marketing gag it should be omitted.

I would like a technical base ISO of 50 /25 and a extension of the Quality for 1 EV at least in the high ISO's

Pentax should use there patent with the fixed mirror, which can be switched between reflective and partly reflective up to transparent and build an variabe ND-Filter into the body.
10-11-2019, 04:15 AM   #18
Pentaxian At Large
Loyal Site Supporter
robgski's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 4,862
QuoteOriginally posted by parinya-ekparinya Quote
Having ISO 64 for a Sunny day is useful for me
I agree.
10-11-2019, 07:40 AM   #19
WillWeaverRVA's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Richmond, VA
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,055
I wouldn't mind having access to ISO 80 or ISO 64, but not behind an extended ISO option. Just make it available from the get-go or don't have it. I never liked having to enable an option in the menu to access features that shouldn't be hidden in a menu to begin with.


  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
ae, apsc, apsc or future, base, body, dr, exposure, ff, flagship, future, future ff flagship, image, images, iso, iso200, light, pentax, photography, post, quality, range, sensor, snr, underexposure
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Price of new apsc flagship abhaskare Pentax DSLR Discussion 119 11-02-2019 11:40 PM
Pentax KP vs. D750 raws at high ISO 25600 - Pentax APSC on par with Nikon FF beholder3 Pentax News and Rumors 72 03-01-2017 02:30 PM
A look at APSC compacts - how do PENTAX next flagship compete? LFLee Pentax DSLR Discussion 11 07-04-2013 07:05 PM
Ferrari leapfrog Pentax with its new FF flagship! raider General Talk 25 01-31-2011 10:34 AM
Going camping. Should I bring my AF-360fgz? Macro lens? What should I bring? igowerf Photographic Technique 11 08-17-2007 07:48 AM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:07 AM. | See also:, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]