Originally posted by brewmaster15 ... A professional photographer I know suggested to set up folders by subject which seems like a good idea. If I had a folder called "Herons" I could find that image of a great blue heron I took a few years ago but have since forgotten when.
Al
I make sure my cameras record a unique number, that's key eg K1xyznnn, K3xyznnn etc.
Copy to PC with date prefix on folder, to which I append location, subject etc. Maybe I'll add a .txt file to include shoot details.
Then I get rid of the junk I've captured. Semi-junk goes into a holding folder to decide later.
The remaining better shots get backed up.
So now I know the camera & it's details, location, date etc. of reasonable to good shots and all's backed up.
I then format my SD cards ready for next shoot.
At some time later I will move these named and dated folders into subjects eg personal or work. Then sub-folders for personal->holiday, personal->xmas etc etc. and backup the folder structure.
That's the easy bit, sadly. The next level is what to do with the processed files. If you embed as much details in the processed files as possible, with clear naming of layers etc, this helps a lot in remembering details. I then tend to leave the processed files in the same folders as the originals, but name the processed file for their purpose, eg "location"+"print or screen"+size".psd. So the folder then has the RAW, the various prepared psd files and the TIFF or JPEGs for each image.
Bridge is my absolute hero for managing all my images. It is so easy with a named and dated folder to select, label, rate and sort images to see the wood from the trees.
I've never got on with tagging, mostly as I don't end up doing it over time. If I take a hundred plus shots on a date at a location, this info is generally enough for me to recall the basics of the shoot. True I might be better served by adding a tag that says #sheep, or #squirrel, or #red shoes, but life's too short.
Just my quirky way of working ...