Originally posted by BigMackCam
Agreed. And being "skeleton like" (though I think that's a pretty negative description), Pentax has very limited risk in the market compared to Nikon. Bet BIG, and you could lose BIG. Bet small, and you could lose small. Let's hope Nikon's BIG bet results in plentiful sales of that new Z lens lineup...
While I of course wish that Pentax's market share increases, I do not wish for any competitor to sink. It's never been good for the market, and wishing others ill is not a solid market strategy...
Originally posted by clickclick
It's got to be about a bottom line figure and market analysis. Without insight to information that's probably confidential to Nikon, we'll never know for sure, but must assume it was decided as a way to meet the need within a cost structure. How all those pieces tie together and what comes out the other end goes into the "time will tell" and "anybody's guess" categories without more information
Of course the people making the decisions are not clueless. The question is, when they make that decision, are they happy about it or is it the least of two evils? Is it to encourage growth or to stop the bleeding?