Originally posted by BigDave I am reminded of a graph I saw (one such example posted here) of a new photographers PERCEIVED skill and ACTUAL skill/ability. In simple terms, when you know little, you think you are better than you are. As you learn the medium/discipline, you also start understanding what lack of skill you may have, and you may also be over critical. Keep going and you get better on both! So, yes, post your images and let us give you feedback. You are only going to get better because of it! PS- And if you know what you want to achieve with an image, and achieved that, then don't be discouraged if others don't see your vision of it!
I totally understand what you are saying, and you are absolutely right.
But in my case, I had been looking at pictures I took way, 3-4 years ago and even further back, and I like them better than the stuff I'm doing now...
I think it's what in music we used to call "2nd album decline" - a band puts all their effort of years into their first album, then sort of coasts into the 2nd album and doesn't put as much effort - first because they didn't spend as much time on it, second because they don't challenge themselves as they did in the beginning.
We should always be challenging ourselves otherwise our work becomes stagnant... not to mention in the beginning we are more "wide eyed and mystified" and amazed at the things we can do... that is more what I was talking about. I got to get that passion back.
Originally posted by biz-engineer Not good. You can take tons of pictures and never get anything compelling, quantity of trial and error has nothing to do with the result. Trial and error doesn't get you anywhere if you don't have an idee of the kind of photograph you want to achieve first. Creating a photograph that stands out , starts with visualizing the kind of photograph you aim at (what kind of element you want in a photograph), then figure out the list of conditions required: where to go, when to go, what time to go.[COLOR=Silver]
What you describe is basically the ideal setting of landscape photography, which I realize a lot of people here do.
Well some kinds of photography are more reactive than planned. Street photography, for example, or travel photography to a point (especially when you're traveling with family). You go to a place you haven't been before so even if you think you know the place from researching it, you get there and sort of have to create your game plan right then. The more time you have to look at all the different angles the better - but you're doing this as light is changing, or might not be ideal to start with.
A lot of photography is reaction to what you have to work with, trying to do your best with the cards you are dealt, so to speak.
Quote: I totally agree on this. In professions, you'll always have people who claim that education is not necessary (usually people who don't have education will claim that education is not necessary when in competition for job positions). That's utter BS, no one would want to be a passenger on a flight knowing the pilot is new and learning by trial & error. In order to fly a commercial aircraft, you better know the rules, understand the rules, and follow the rules, and have thousand of hours of flying experience on top of it.
Sorry but that's a strawman if I've ever seen one...