I had no intention of stirring up a loaded/political/environment discussion - I was only commenting/inquiring on the difficulty of the current situation and curious how anyone else has dealt with it who is cave enthusiast given escalating seriousness of the issue. I have no intention of promoting deception/lying or reckless practices as I find it both immoral and destructive to behave in such a way for merely one's own enjoyment.
Other posters are correct in that the spores can travel through the air system and settled on various objects- they can be decontaminated and tested, but it can be difficult and entails more than just throwing something in a washing machine, thus the necessity of the rules.
My suspicion is many professionals who engage in cave photography likely have to spend a great deal and write off the purchases or sell the gear when done to offset the cost. It sounds like there aren't many on the boards here who have run into this issue, but I would be very interested in how they have handled it.
The camera case sounds like a reasonable way to comply if the sealed casing is retired form service and new one placed on the camera after exposure, but may not meet the "letter" of the law.
I have one camera that has never been in a cave (lumix G) which I will be taking on my next endeavor, and have replaced my hiking shoes this season, so it will be ok this year, but the the couple stops I have planned next year may force me into a K3III
. I'll probably just buy a new wide-angle and re-sell it with a disclosure after I'm done. High demand gear is showing mild depreciation on the used market for the time being.