So, despite not having used any of the lenses listed, I voted. Here's my rationale:
- I enjoy camera gear, and have read at least a little something about most of the lenses.
- I'm not especially biased regarding one brand or another - I have respect and appreciation for all brands, and would not hesitate to leave my primary brand (Pentax) if I
really wanted something from a different system - which occasionally gets me in trouble here.
- I considered the lenses this way: if I had a camera that had a universal mount, which lens would I most likely buy?
And for me, the answer is...
.
.
.
.
.
Pentax D FA 21/2.4 Limited
What sets the 21/2.4 Ltd apart from other lenses with similar specifications is the close-focus capability and lovely bokeh. It seems a unique offering and is
exactly what I would want in a FF wide angle prime, and would also be a treat on APS-C.
The other contender for my affection is the Canon 600/4, but no way in H E double-hockey-sticks would I ever consider shelling out that kind of cash for photo gear.
As an aside, this year Ricoh has released two pieces of gear that have captivated me: the 21/2.4 Ltd, and the GR IIIx. Well done, Ricoh.