Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version 17 Likes Search this Thread
02-18-2022, 06:36 PM - 2 Likes   #1
Closed Account
Michael Piziak's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 2,815
Astronomers Join Forces to Push Back Against Satellite 'Pollution' Ruining The Skies

Thought this would be of interest to those of you that do Astro Photography


Astronomers Join Forces to Push Back Against Satellite 'Pollution' Ruining The Skies

02-18-2022, 07:08 PM - 3 Likes   #2
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter




Join Date: May 2007
Location: Flagstaff, Arizona
Posts: 1,648
The last time I was shooting a comet, every other frame (~10-30 second exposures) had satellite trails in them.

This is basically another example of a "tragedy of the commons" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons) i.e. exploitation of something that collectively belongs to everybody (a dark sky) but is over used/exploited by a few, with few, if any, immediate consequences.

As a radio astronomer, I have sworn off ever getting internet via such satellites. By some definitions, our internet is not adequate - we have DSL and get ~12 MBs download, but only 0.7 MBs upload. We are too far out in the boonies (just 6-8 miles from town/already existing cable, but past a lot of empty space) for cable.
02-18-2022, 08:16 PM - 2 Likes   #3
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Utica,Il
Posts: 184
Light polution took away my view of the night sky many years ago.
Now sadly no matter which direction that I look all that I can see are the flashing red lights of wind turbines. I'm sure that there are younger people than I who have never experienced the beauty of a crystal clear night sky. Thats a tragedy
02-18-2022, 09:47 PM   #4
Closed Account
Michael Piziak's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 2,815
Original Poster
I seen a news segment where the city of Chicago has completely converted all their public street lights to LED lights. On the show, it was reported that it was an environmental win since the LED lights use much less energy and an added bonus is the lights are saving the city much money in electricity costs.


After I read the article I linked to, I see where these exact such LED lights are hated by astronomers as they produce much more light pollution....

02-18-2022, 11:53 PM - 1 Like   #5
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Michail_P's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Kalymnos
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 3,006
Hopefully there are still some places where a crystal clear sky can be enjoyed. Not much can be done about those satellites, I’m afraid.
02-19-2022, 06:27 AM - 4 Likes   #6
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter




Join Date: May 2007
Location: Flagstaff, Arizona
Posts: 1,648
QuoteOriginally posted by Michael Piziak Quote
After I read the article I linked to, I see where these exact such LED lights are hated by astronomers as they produce much more light pollution....
An interesting problem, but solvable.

Here in Flagstaff (the world's first "Dark Sky City"), street lights are also being replaced by LEDs, but with the concern and help of the local astronomers, to both cut down on light pollution (aim those lights DOWN, not up!) and make sure the spectral characteristics of the light are pleasing to users (those on the streets at night) as well as astronomically-friendly (not so much blue light). The good lights cost somewhat more, but the cost was deemed appropriate here.

To some extent, astronomers prefer the old fashioned sodium vapor lights (the ones with the yellow cast, which give you a ghastly skin tone). Almost all the light from these is emitted in a very narrow spectral range, which can be filtered out with appropriate narrow-band filters, leaving most of the rest of the spectrum undamaged and the sky relatively dark at those non-sodium wavelengths.

Overall, the LED lights make about as much total light as do the sodiums. The biggest mistake most cities (and private citizens) make with lighting is not aiming at ALL down. When you fly over a city at night, all that light you see from the plane is aimed upwards! That is wasted light - it doesn't do any good at all for folks wanting to see what's going on on the ground/street! It's that upwards-going light that gets scattered all over the sky, in all directions, which is what astronomers hate!!!!!
02-19-2022, 08:34 AM   #7
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Idaho
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,379
It's definitely a problem that grows with population growth (more total lights). I live in what would have once been considered the country, but now the growth of population has converted my dark skies to hazy ones and even in the larger towns where one could at least see stars, they are starting to become invisible. I, however, have a summer getaway which is about 50 miles from the nearest "town", and there, I can still enjoy the night sky in all its splendor, something that's becoming a privilege rather than a gift.

Lighting manufactures really need to take into account where their products point as AstroDave has mentioned which is all the more important with LED lights since they can't be filtered out of astro-images the way arc lighting lends itself.

02-19-2022, 12:17 PM   #8
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
StiffLegged's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2018
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 4,639
In our part of the world the street lights are being changed to led down-pointing units as they become due replacing. We’re sure the old sodium units gave more light to the street, but did we want to live in orange half-light…?
02-19-2022, 01:34 PM   #9
Moderator
Loyal Site Supporter
Wheatfield's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The wheatfields of Canada
Posts: 15,991
QuoteOriginally posted by StiffLegged Quote
In our part of the world the street lights are being changed to led down-pointing units as they become due replacing. We’re sure the old sodium units gave more light to the street, but did we want to live in orange half-light…?
My city is converting over to LED street lights. One of the things I have noticed is how much closer to the city I have to be before I can see the glow from them. They are also brighter at street level than the old sodium lights.
02-19-2022, 03:32 PM   #10
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter




Join Date: May 2007
Location: Flagstaff, Arizona
Posts: 1,648
QuoteOriginally posted by Wheatfield Quote
One of the things I have noticed is how much closer to the city I have to be before I can see the glow from them.
That is probably a design effect. The older sodium lamps tend to have a bulbous glass enclosure, which may be almost half a hemisphere in shape. Unless the whole lamp is recessed deep within a case, that enclosure radiates all over the place, including at least somewhat upward.

The new LED lamps (at least the ones here) have a very flat emitting surface (i.e. the numerous individual LEDs that comprise the lamp are all in a plane), so they are much easier to shield from sending light out other than down - a small skirt around the edge works fine. As you approach and look at some of these lamps, you see absolutely no light until you are close to right underneath. And, then they are VERY bright! Much brighter than looking at a sodium bulb.
02-19-2022, 04:03 PM - 2 Likes   #11
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Madaboutpix's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: North Rhine-Westphalia
Posts: 1,448
To my mind, light pollution - whether down here or up in the orbit - is so much more than just some sort of nuisance bugging a bunch of stargazers or astro photographers. It is one of the countless ways in which humans have changed Earth's environment so fundamentally in what is now called the Anthropocene that it surely needs a more holistic perspective to find sustainable answers. More sustainability in this sense would incidentally also spell good news for us photographers, I reckon.
02-19-2022, 05:38 PM - 2 Likes   #12
Pentaxian
Thagomizer's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: London Ontario
Posts: 2,068
QuoteOriginally posted by Madaboutpix Quote
To my mind, light pollution - whether down here or up in the orbit - is so much more than just some sort of nuisance bugging a bunch of stargazers or astro photographers. It is one of the countless ways in which humans have changed Earth's environment so fundamentally in what is now called the Anthropocene that it surely needs a more holistic perspective to find sustainable answers. More sustainability in this sense would incidentally also spell good news for us photographers, I reckon.
Indeed; the disruption of migration and lifeways of birds, insects, and other night-active creatures is an important issue too. We're not the only inhabitants of this planet, but too often we act as if we are.
02-19-2022, 09:56 PM   #13
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Digitalis's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 11,695
One astrophysicist also pointed out the increased number of satellites polluting the skies also hinders the detection of incoming asteroids, which are typically quite faint objects in the night sky.
02-20-2022, 02:39 AM - 1 Like   #14
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter




Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Dallas / Yucatan
Posts: 1,842
QuoteOriginally posted by Digitalis Quote
One astrophysicist also pointed out the increased number of satellites polluting the skies also hinders the detection of incoming asteroids, which are typically quite faint objects in the night sky.
Oh dear! Hoping to live out my mortal coil before becoming an impact crater like Chicxulub!
02-20-2022, 08:09 PM   #15
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter




Join Date: May 2016
Location: East Coast
Posts: 2,904
QuoteOriginally posted by AstroDave Quote
And, then they are VERY bright!
This is one of the things I'm really disliking about LEDs and how they are being used. I find they are often bright to the point of being overpowering. I don't know if it's people just buying too powerful a bulb, bad color balance - harsh blue/white, not the right fixture/installation or all of the above. One of my neighbors appears to have fitted LED bulbs into standard fixtures on either side of their front door. The intensity of the light that they admit at night is nuts. It's really harsh looking towards their house, and it's a decent distance off. Not only is it uncomfortable to look at, but it completely blows away your night vision. I much prefer the warm glow of a low output tungsten filament. Satisfies my caveman roots.

Last edited by clickclick; 02-20-2022 at 08:50 PM.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
astronomers, astronomers join forces, forces, photography, satellite, skies

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Guest Photographers Ruining Professional Wedding Images interested_observer Photographic Technique 27 05-19-2013 05:30 PM
Is my new K-5 ruining my external flashes? funky1 Pentax K-5 & K-5 II 30 01-17-2012 09:59 PM
Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY) on the GOP's push against abortion deadwolfbones General Talk 4 03-07-2011 04:53 PM
Ron Paul and Ralph Nader join forces GeneV General Talk 4 01-27-2011 09:51 AM
To push or not to push jbinpg Pentax K-5 & K-5 II 7 11-21-2010 05:03 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:55 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top