Originally posted by Michael Piziak After I read the article I linked to, I see where these exact such LED lights are hated by astronomers as they produce much more light pollution....
An interesting problem, but solvable.
Here in Flagstaff (the world's first "Dark Sky City"), street lights are also being replaced by LEDs, but with the concern and help of the local astronomers, to both cut down on light pollution (aim those lights DOWN, not up!) and make sure the spectral characteristics of the light are pleasing to users (those on the streets at night) as well as astronomically-friendly (not so much blue light). The good lights cost somewhat more, but the cost was deemed appropriate here.
To some extent, astronomers prefer the old fashioned sodium vapor lights (the ones with the yellow cast, which give you a ghastly skin tone). Almost all the light from these is emitted in a very narrow spectral range, which can be filtered out with appropriate narrow-band filters, leaving most of the rest of the spectrum undamaged and the sky relatively dark at those non-sodium wavelengths.
Overall, the LED lights make about as much total light as do the sodiums. The biggest mistake most cities (and private citizens) make with lighting is not aiming at ALL down. When you fly over a city at night, all that light you see from the plane is aimed upwards! That is wasted light - it doesn't do any good at all for folks wanting to see what's going on on the ground/street! It's that upwards-going light that gets scattered all over the sky, in all directions, which is what astronomers hate!!!!!