Originally posted by WPRESTO If the product is of such low quality that it will spontaneous fail within two or three years, it probably isn't worth buying.
I guess that would apply to most cameras and computers.
(See CU's reliability stats for cameras and computers...)
I generally agree with CU's advice, though with a few exceptions for expensive electronics intended for field use. When my daughter started university a few years back, I bought her a high-end Dell business-class laptop. I also added the available 3-year warranty extension for an extra $150 (or there abouts). That computer went in for repair twice and replacement once within the warranty period (4 years). It appears that students are hard on their laptops and while there were no overt drops or spills she still had problems.
I am typing on a Lenovo ThinkPad business-class laptop that for the most part has lived its life out on my kitchen counter with occasional excursions to exotic locations. It required a new display within the first three months of ownership and at about 24 months the on-board camera failed. The $100 two-year warranty extension would have been a bargain, but I neglected to do the purchase
I consider cameras to be in the same class of equipment and as a result was happy to pay out the $20 for the extension on my K-3. In my opinion $100 is still not overpriced, though if a 3rd-party policy that includes drops/spills is also available in the same price range is even better (assuming "replace with like" terms).
Steve