Originally posted by dlhawes I have to agree with OP for two reasons: first that camera sells new from Ricoh for about nine hundred bucks right now, so how could it possibly be worth over eight hundred to fix one? Do they have to replace everything that's inside the camera? Secondly, "right to repair" laws have not yet gone into place as a global thing in the U.S., so Precision is exploiting its dominant market power by virtue of a monopoly on parts and service because Ricoh will only provide parts and manuals to them. In other words, using monopoly power to rip off consumers.
And, by the way, @sibyrnes, they know perfectly well they have little or no customer support. I won't ever buy anything from them again for that one reason, after having been burned several times.
It could be that the camera is really uneconomical to fix. Maybe, as I pointed out prior, the "repair cost" is really replacement cost.
It can also be that parts are not available, due to the global chip shortage or other supply issues, perhaps. So, maybe it's replacement for that reason.
It can also be that making something in a factory is cheap, but repairing something small and complex is not.
As example, when my K-1ii needed to have the cracked top cover replaced, the camera could not be repaired by the service agent here because they did not have the necessary tools or spares and it had to be sent to Japan for repair. That, naturally, took months as practically the whole world was in Covid lockdown turmoil. And, it cost what it cost, which, for the K-1ii was $590 + $155 freight to Japan = $745.00 I have no doubt that the top cover would cost a fraction of that, but that's not the point. The point is that someone with the required skills and correct tools had to take the camera apart, fit the new part, check the whole camera for other damage due to the bump and recalibrate the camera before sending it back to me in New Zealand. Even if I could buy the top cover, I could not buy (nor would I want to buy) the testing rig hardware and software and other tools required to test the camera and calibrate it after repair.
Calling out the "right of repair" laws does not change the fact that we're dealing with intricate high precision optical instruments with miniaturized parts and specialized equipment needed to repair. In much the same way as my mobile phone is not economical to repair, the same probably holds true for many cameras. I think it's a bit unfair of you to accuse Precision or Ricoh of "ripping off customers" as you have done here.
Just my two cents worth. (Or $745 worth - well, would have been if I did not make an insurance claim, so really $250 worth)
Last edited by MarkJerling; 03-28-2022 at 02:58 PM.
Reason: typo