Originally posted by FantasticMrFox I wasn't really thinking of advanced amateurs, rather people who really have little clue, like a Chinese tourist I saw in Namibia who sported a Nikon D810 and 14-24 f/2.8, 24-70 f/2.8 and 70-200 f/2.8, but grabbed his DSLR like a compact camera, with his fingers on either side of the body. [I]"All the gear and no idea"
Some people call that sort of thing, "All hat and no cattle."
There's an unfriendly part of me that wants to respond, "I don't {insert long string of Anglo-Saxon invective here} someone thinks about whether I need a K-1. It's my hobby, it's my money, it's my camera, they're my image files and it's none of (someone)'s business whether a K-1 is appropriate for me.
But I won't do that here.
Really, it's just a decision. I wanted a K-1. I bought a K-1. Consequently I won't be able to buy some other thing, whatever that other thing is.
I spent last weekend at my niece's wedding in Pennsylvania. I took K-1, the FA Limiteds and the FA24~90. My bag was a lot heavier than taking the K-3 and DA Limiteds in similar focal lengths.
It was nice to frame photos and stand distances from subjects that I had been accustomed to before 2006. It felt right, and natural, not contrived. I myself think the images are better than I would have done with my K-3 and that's what matters, really.
No one commented about my camera. Even the two pro's shooting Canon with L glass.
I stayed out of their way - I didn't Uncle Bob them. They didn't think I should have used a flash at the reception in a barn though. And they told me. (Four shots bounce 540fgz, and I didn't shoot when they were shooting).
So I'm absolutely sure I'm a rank amateur because a couple Canon shooters in their twenties said so.