Originally posted by AfterPentax Mark II
Unfortunately this keeps coming up "when will there be a new K-1 Mark III?". My guess is never! First Ricoh has to earn back the investment on the K-3 Mark III. From the interviews the management of Ricoh it is clear that they must make an effort to keep the Pentax brand alive. Outdated technology? What is wrong with a superb camera dating from 2015 or 2016? There are even people that (want to) buy Spotmatics, K1000,vintage lenses and so on. It seems that in photography there is no such thing as outdated technology. Why must something that is so good be changed? And why would an updated lens indicate there is another camera coming? It just means is that there is an updated lens coming. Nothing more, nothing less.
If you were paying attention when the DAF*85/1.4 was released, you would have seen the press releases indicating that they wanted that lens to have high enough resolution for future higher resolution sensors.
At some point they won't be able to get 36mp sensors any longer and will be forced to update the camera.
Definition of outdated: no longer current (Merriam-Webster dictionary)
And yes, there is such a thing as outdated technology in photography, especially digital photography. Just because people still shoot with Spotmatics doesn't mean they aren't outdated, it just means people still shoot with them.
What is wrong with cameras from 2015 or 2016? Nothing, but this doesn't mean time has stopped at that date either.