Originally posted by geomez Regarding costs, he says that a used K-1 and lenses used is more expensive than an equivalent used Canikon systems, but doesn't calculate a used Pentax system with any lenses released before last year.
That price comparison was very strange.
If "buying used" is an option, the whole idea that there are only a few FF lenses for the K-1 falls down. At this point he should have mentioned the plethora of great legacy glass available for the K-1.
Also, I find the idea of the K-1 being too slow to take portraits preposterous. There might be a name for the approach he appears to be using -- "spray and pray" springs to make -- but it isn't "portraiture".
P.S.: I'm pretty sure he is wrong about the D810 and the K-1 sharing the same sensor and the K-1 ISO 100 actually being ISO 50.