Originally posted by acoufap Thank’s for your kind reply! I’m sure you show what you intended to.
Pictures shown in these forums are wonderful. But sometimes I think people could get a bit more out of them - of course to my perception. That’s pretty much subjective and may not mean anything to the photographer or/and other beholders. It's nice if we can have a little conversation about different ideas. Thanks for your infos about how you consider going this or that way in such an image!
---------- Post added 2018-07-21 at 14:07 ----------
Here are some versions of one image respectively a stack of a scenery taken with K-1 and DFA100WR.
Since yesterday evening it’s been raining. While rain had a break I thought I could do a stack of a flower with a lot of nice rain drops on the blossom. So I used tripod and macro rail to do the job. Here’s one image of the stack …
Hm, working in C1P I selected some pictures of the stack and called Helicon Focus. Rendering Method B was pre set. I was pretty surprised since the result wasn’t what I expected …
Although not very realistic I like it very much. I had not only selected the images I wanted to use but also the ones I had taken at f/8 and f/11. They ought to be something like "control" images. Interesting effect. A second try without the "control" images showed that the main problem was using method B for this scenario. So by this fault I learned how I can get a nice artistic effect. This could be helpful in the future.
Ok. Now the result using Rendering Method A …
This shows what I expected but in my book looks a bit boring compared to the second image. So to tell the truth, my favorite is the „artistical“ version.
P.s. My last try was using Rendering Method C. Result was similar that of Rendering Method A that I preferred in the end.
Interesting, love a bit of a walkthrough with a shot. I haven't really done any proper focus stacking, the only shot I think I have ever taken where I think there was an element of focus stacking was this shot of this orb weaver;
Two shots taken for this image, with the focus placed at different points (one on the tip of it's abdomen, one near the intersection of the legs). It was handheld and I was already at f16 with 1/25th of a shutter speed for the DFA 100, I'd be needing to bump the ISO up an aperture that might cover what I took with these two shots.
I'm always curious about the focus stacking thing tho, like the rails and the like. I have to say I don't quite understand how you can physically move the camera's distance from the subject (and of course your choice of focus) and then stack the images together at the end and not get a warped or weirded out subject due to the varying distances shot. With my stack here above the camera was roughly in the same spot, all I did was change the DoF plane on the spider via the focus ring and take a second snap. So I thought focus stacking would make more sense to have a fixed distance between the camera and object and instead just change the focal plane with each shot (covering near to far).
I must look into it further because I must be missing something as macro focusing rails are a thing, clearly moving the camera assists with the principle and end result