Post your K-1 pictures!

**BruceBanner** · 09-26-2019, 05:25 AM - **4 Likes**

Originally posted by acoufap

K-1 • DFA150-450 @ 450

Nice capture, I like some motion blur.

Originally posted by ranchy

Recent shots.. outing with film users while i am the only Digital camera user which K1 (mk 2 upgraded)

Mitakon 85 1.2

FA200 F2.8

DFA50 F1.4

Nice. How are you finding the mikakon?

-----------

Magic Tree

**Erictator** · 09-26-2019, 08:34 AM - **12 Likes**

OK, I'm back... where have I been? Lost in space!

Color space that is...

Without going too deep into the saga, let's suffice it to say that I flipped Adobe ACR somhow to EsRGB by mistake from sRGB where it had been set for eon's... and it left me chasing my tail. I also found that even if you have your Adobe PhotoShop color space set to sRGB, but your working color space isn't set to force whatever you open in RAW to your Working colorspace and embed it, then you are still screwed.

THEN... when I asked for help here, it opened my eyes to another issue I hadn't noticed before... internet browser differences in displaying pics. The same photo hosted on Flickr, even with the correct color space, looks a tad washed out in Chrome compared to Internet Explorer. Nothing to be done about that, it is what it is, but it is frustrating to know that some who view your work won't see it at it's best. Grrrrr!

Ok Ok. Here is a repost of an earlier shot, it "should" look right in IE, and at least decent in Chrome now.
Let me know. (holds breath)
Thanks,
Eric

HD PENTAX-D FA 150-450mm F4.5-5.6ED DC AW ƒ/7.1 450.0 mm 1/1250 iso1250

**barondla** · 09-26-2019, 08:49 AM - **1 Like**

Originally posted by Erictator

OK, I'm back... where have I been? Lost in space!

Color space that is...

Without going too deep into the saga, let's suffice it to say that I flipped Adobe ACR somhow to EsRGB by mistake from sRGB where it had been set for eon's... and it left me chasing my tail. I also found that even if you have your Adobe PhotoShop color space set to sRGB, but your working color space isn't set to force whatever you open in RAW to your Working colorspace and embed it, then you are still screwed.

THEN... when I asked for help here, it opened my eyes to another issue I hadn't noticed before... internet browser differences in displaying pics. The same photo hosted on Flickr, even with the correct color space, looks a tad washed out in Chrome compared to Internet Explorer. Nothing to be done about that, it is what it is, but it is frustrating to know that some who view your work won't see it at it's best. Grrrrr!

Ok Ok. Here is a repost of an earlier shot, it "should" look right in IE, and at least decent in Chrome now.
Let me know. (holds breath)
Thanks,
Eric

HD PENTAX-D FA 150-450mm F4.5-5.6ED DC AW ƒ/7.1 450.0 mm 1/1250 iso1250

Great shot. Color and exposure looks nice on Amazon Fire 8 tablet using Silk browser. Color space is complicated. I'd rather be shooting pictures.

Thanks for sharing,
barondla

Patriot · 09-26-2019, 09:03 AM - **5 Likes**

The reflection.

**acoufap** · 09-26-2019, 10:48 AM

Originally posted by BruceBanner

Nice capture, I like some motion blur.

Thank you, Bruce!

**fs999** · 09-26-2019, 11:18 AM - **8 Likes**

Originally posted by Erictator

Without going too deep into the saga, let's suffice it to say that I flipped Adobe ACR somhow to EsRGB by mistake from sRGB where it had been set for eon's...

Originally posted by Erictator

The same photo hosted on Flickr, even with the correct color space, looks a tad washed out in Chrome compared to Internet Explorer. Nothing to be done about that, it is what it is, but it is frustrating to know that some who view your work won't see it at it's best. Grrrrr!

And in FireFox !

Originally posted by Erictator

Ok Ok. Here is a repost of an earlier shot, it "should" look right in IE, and at least decent in Chrome now.
Let me know. (holds breath)
Thanks,
Eric

Wonderful shot ! ERIC IS BACK !!!! YEAHHHHHH !!!!!!

FF Mode • 100 ISO • Pentax DA* 200mm F2.8 ED SDM

FF Mode • 800 ISO • Sigma Art 18-35mm F1.8 DC HSM
My preferred jam : Vineyard Peaches

FF Mode • 100 ISO • Soligor C/D Wide-Auto 20mm f:2.8
(For celebrating Eric's comeback

)

**Erictator** · 09-26-2019, 12:15 PM - **2 Likes**

Originally posted by fs999

And in FireFox !

Wonderful shot ! ERIC IS BACK !!!! YEAHHHHHH !!!!!!

Thanks Frederic! Beautiful set!

BTW: I just learned something else, I was able to make Chrome look as good as IE by going into Chrome/Settings/Advanced and turning OFF Hardware Acceleration, which was ON by default.
What a difference these silly little check-boxes make.

Eric

*jbb356* · 09-26-2019, 02:57 PM - **4 Likes**

Just hanging out in the front yard while our two boys run around
FA 50mm F1.7

GvilleRick · 09-26-2019, 03:57 PM - **8 Likes**

Saw this guy in my front yard. First shot is with my Sigma 50-500 so I could stay back a bit. He was about 4 feet long.

After a few shots I switched to my Tamron 90mm macro and got up much closer.

He climbed up a Japanese maple.

**BruceBanner** · 09-26-2019, 04:40 PM - **5 Likes**

Originally posted by Erictator

OK, I'm back... where have I been? Lost in space!

Color space that is...

Without going too deep into the saga, let's suffice it to say that I flipped Adobe ACR somhow to EsRGB by mistake from sRGB where it had been set for eon's... and it left me chasing my tail. I also found that even if you have your Adobe PhotoShop color space set to sRGB, but your working color space isn't set to force whatever you open in RAW to your Working colorspace and embed it, then you are still screwed.

THEN... when I asked for help here, it opened my eyes to another issue I hadn't noticed before... internet browser differences in displaying pics. The same photo hosted on Flickr, even with the correct color space, looks a tad washed out in Chrome compared to Internet Explorer. Nothing to be done about that, it is what it is, but it is frustrating to know that some who view your work won't see it at it's best. Grrrrr!

Ok Ok. Here is a repost of an earlier shot, it "should" look right in IE, and at least decent in Chrome now.
Let me know. (holds breath)
Thanks,
Eric

HD PENTAX-D FA 150-450mm F4.5-5.6ED DC AW ƒ/7.1 450.0 mm 1/1250 iso1250

Yeah I have a few issues as well;

If I start with a raw DNG file in LR, process it to being monochrome and then right click the file and 'Edit in>Photoshop' then photoshop converts the monochrome shot to being colour. Colour and work spaces are the same in both LR and PS.. I dunno what gives, I think I might uninstall both today and do fresh reinstalls.

Another anomaly is if I do the above process (LR>Edit in>PS) and then Export in PS as a srgb Jpg the colours are completely off and ruined. I have to hit 'Save' in PS, get the image with the changes applied back to LR and then Export from LR to get colour accuracy fixed. Again no idea why...

It's annoying.

The funniest thing of all however is when doing paid work for a client. You start off with a studio portrait mug shot at around 40mb DNG file. You then spend 20mins editing, F&S etc etc to end up with a wonderful 20mb Jpg file that makes the subject look 10yrs younger lol. But then somehow... during the exchange of files (direct emails with the full res file as well as download links), the client manages to screw everything up and set up your image to being a measly 50kb pixelated and ruined portrait profile shot on Facebook (LOL!). This is despite also giving 'Facebook Friendly' (2048 longest edge) versions as well...

So I have come to the conclusion that you have to let some control go. Different browsers, different screens (some calibrated, some not), etc. In fact I have two screens set up, one is calibrated and the other is not, the other is a bright saturated screen that might display what the image looks like on a lot of joe bloggs phones, so I like to check how the image would look on both screens. Sometimes I think that's what we should be doing, calibrating our screens to match the clients or masses! ha!

Anyway...

--------------------

This is Rose.

dbs · 09-26-2019, 04:58 PM

The old ' if you must' look
Not looking your way whilst you have one big and one small eye

Dave

**OldPentaxFan** · 09-26-2019, 05:00 PM - **4 Likes**

This was an outdoor concert in the evening so lighting was by stage light only.

I think it turned out pretty well for handheld in the back of the audience.

Some motion blur but I think it adds to the scene rather than detracts from it.

**jabobby** · 09-26-2019, 05:24 PM - **2 Likes**

Originally posted by Erictator

OK, I'm back... where have I been? Lost in space!

Color space that is...

Without going too deep into the saga, let's suffice it to say that I flipped Adobe ACR somhow to EsRGB by mistake from sRGB where it had been set for eon's... and it left me chasing my tail. I also found that even if you have your Adobe PhotoShop color space set to sRGB, but your working color space isn't set to force whatever you open in RAW to your Working colorspace and embed it, then you are still screwed.

THEN... when I asked for help here, it opened my eyes to another issue I hadn't noticed before... internet browser differences in displaying pics. The same photo hosted on Flickr, even with the correct color space, looks a tad washed out in Chrome compared to Internet Explorer. Nothing to be done about that, it is what it is, but it is frustrating to know that some who view your work won't see it at it's best. Grrrrr!

Ok Ok. Here is a repost of an earlier shot, it "should" look right in IE, and at least decent in Chrome now.
Let me know. (holds breath)
Thanks,
Eric

HD PENTAX-D FA 150-450mm F4.5-5.6ED DC AW ƒ/7.1 450.0 mm 1/1250 iso1250

First let me say that I agree with what Frederic said so nicely, great to see you back Eric. This photo looks stunning on my calibrated monitor. The previous posts of that shot looked like they were taken in the fog...heavy fog at that.

Best Regards, Bob

**eaglem** · 09-26-2019, 07:47 PM - **2 Likes**

Nature's contrasts

**BruceBanner** · 09-26-2019, 09:24 PM

Originally posted by OldPentaxFan

This was an outdoor concert in the evening so lighting was by stage light only.

I think it turned out pretty well for handheld in the back of the audience.

Some motion blur but I think it adds to the scene rather than detracts from it.

It does, I think the best music, public speaking events etc are best when there is a sense of movement, you just want to have it controlled (which you have). 10/10.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Post pictures made with your worst lens!	LensBeginner	Pentax SLR Lens Discussion	27	08-02-2018 10:27 AM
Post your K5IIs pictures here...	SECELEE	Pentax K-5 & K-5 II	2	02-21-2015 09:30 PM
There should be a post your K-30 pictures thread	memo90061	Pentax K-30 & K-50	3	10-30-2012 02:06 AM
Thematic Post your winter pictures	ohce	Mini-Challenges, Games, and Photo Stories	10	03-22-2012 06:17 PM
Who can post pictures in the post your pictures category?	Sitting Bull	Troubleshooting and Beginner Help	3	12-14-2010 05:41 AM

09-26-2019, 05:25 AM - 4 Likes	#25516
BruceBanner Site Supporter Join Date: Dec 2015 Posts: 5,404	Originally posted by acoufap K-1 • DFA150-450 @ 450 Nice capture, I like some motion blur. Originally posted by ranchy Recent shots.. outing with film users while i am the only Digital camera user which K1 (mk 2 upgraded) Mitakon 85 1.2 FA200 F2.8 DFA50 F1.4 Nice. How are you finding the mikakon? ----------- Magic Tree

09-26-2019, 08:34 AM - 12 Likes	#25517
Erictator Site Supporter Join Date: Jul 2011 Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 3,345	OK, I'm back... where have I been? Lost in space! Color space that is... Without going too deep into the saga, let's suffice it to say that I flipped Adobe ACR somhow to EsRGB by mistake from sRGB where it had been set for eon's... and it left me chasing my tail. I also found that even if you have your Adobe PhotoShop color space set to sRGB, but your working color space isn't set to force whatever you open in RAW to your Working colorspace and embed it, then you are still screwed. THEN... when I asked for help here, it opened my eyes to another issue I hadn't noticed before... internet browser differences in displaying pics. The same photo hosted on Flickr, even with the correct color space, looks a tad washed out in Chrome compared to Internet Explorer. Nothing to be done about that, it is what it is, but it is frustrating to know that some who view your work won't see it at it's best. Grrrrr! Ok Ok. Here is a repost of an earlier shot, it "should" look right in IE, and at least decent in Chrome now. Let me know. (holds breath) Thanks, Eric HD PENTAX-D FA 150-450mm F4.5-5.6ED DC AW ƒ/7.1 450.0 mm 1/1250 iso1250

09-26-2019, 08:49 AM - 1 Like	#25518
barondla Site Supporter Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: midwest, United States Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 5,714	Originally posted by Erictator OK, I'm back... where have I been? Lost in space! Color space that is... Without going too deep into the saga, let's suffice it to say that I flipped Adobe ACR somhow to EsRGB by mistake from sRGB where it had been set for eon's... and it left me chasing my tail. I also found that even if you have your Adobe PhotoShop color space set to sRGB, but your working color space isn't set to force whatever you open in RAW to your Working colorspace and embed it, then you are still screwed. THEN... when I asked for help here, it opened my eyes to another issue I hadn't noticed before... internet browser differences in displaying pics. The same photo hosted on Flickr, even with the correct color space, looks a tad washed out in Chrome compared to Internet Explorer. Nothing to be done about that, it is what it is, but it is frustrating to know that some who view your work won't see it at it's best. Grrrrr! Ok Ok. Here is a repost of an earlier shot, it "should" look right in IE, and at least decent in Chrome now. Let me know. (holds breath) Thanks, Eric HD PENTAX-D FA 150-450mm F4.5-5.6ED DC AW ƒ/7.1 450.0 mm 1/1250 iso1250 Great shot. Color and exposure looks nice on Amazon Fire 8 tablet using Silk browser. Color space is complicated. I'd rather be shooting pictures. Thanks for sharing, barondla

09-26-2019, 09:03 AM - 5 Likes	#25519
Patriot Pentaxian Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Holy Land Photos: Gallery Posts: 1,165	The reflection.

09-26-2019, 10:48 AM	#25520
acoufap Site Supporter Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Munich, Germany Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 4,187	Originally posted by BruceBanner Nice capture, I like some motion blur. Thank you, Bruce!

09-26-2019, 11:18 AM - 8 Likes	#25521
fs999 Loyal Site Supporter Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Luxembourg Photos: Gallery Posts: 8,639	Originally posted by Erictator Without going too deep into the saga, let's suffice it to say that I flipped Adobe ACR somhow to EsRGB by mistake from sRGB where it had been set for eon's... Originally posted by Erictator The same photo hosted on Flickr, even with the correct color space, looks a tad washed out in Chrome compared to Internet Explorer. Nothing to be done about that, it is what it is, but it is frustrating to know that some who view your work won't see it at it's best. Grrrrr! And in FireFox ! Originally posted by Erictator Ok Ok. Here is a repost of an earlier shot, it "should" look right in IE, and at least decent in Chrome now. Let me know. (holds breath) Thanks, Eric Wonderful shot ! ERIC IS BACK !!!! YEAHHHHHH !!!!!! FF Mode • 100 ISO • Pentax DA* 200mm F2.8 ED SDM FF Mode • 800 ISO • Sigma Art 18-35mm F1.8 DC HSM My preferred jam : Vineyard Peaches FF Mode • 100 ISO • Soligor C/D Wide-Auto 20mm f:2.8 (For celebrating Eric's comeback )

09-26-2019, 12:15 PM - 2 Likes	#25522
Erictator Site Supporter Join Date: Jul 2011 Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 3,345	Originally posted by fs999 And in FireFox ! Wonderful shot ! ERIC IS BACK !!!! YEAHHHHHH !!!!!! Thanks Frederic! Beautiful set! BTW: I just learned something else, I was able to make Chrome look as good as IE by going into Chrome/Settings/Advanced and turning OFF Hardware Acceleration, which was ON by default. What a difference these silly little check-boxes make. Eric

09-26-2019, 02:57 PM - 4 Likes	#25523
jbb356 Marketplace Reseller Join Date: Aug 2017 Location: Texas Posts: 54	Just hanging out in the front yard while our two boys run around FA 50mm F1.7

09-26-2019, 03:57 PM - 8 Likes	#25524
GvilleRick Pentaxian Join Date: Dec 2011 Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 1,690	Saw this guy in my front yard. First shot is with my Sigma 50-500 so I could stay back a bit. He was about 4 feet long. After a few shots I switched to my Tamron 90mm macro and got up much closer. He climbed up a Japanese maple.

09-26-2019, 04:40 PM - 5 Likes	#25525
BruceBanner Site Supporter Join Date: Dec 2015 Posts: 5,404	Originally posted by Erictator OK, I'm back... where have I been? Lost in space! Color space that is... Without going too deep into the saga, let's suffice it to say that I flipped Adobe ACR somhow to EsRGB by mistake from sRGB where it had been set for eon's... and it left me chasing my tail. I also found that even if you have your Adobe PhotoShop color space set to sRGB, but your working color space isn't set to force whatever you open in RAW to your Working colorspace and embed it, then you are still screwed. THEN... when I asked for help here, it opened my eyes to another issue I hadn't noticed before... internet browser differences in displaying pics. The same photo hosted on Flickr, even with the correct color space, looks a tad washed out in Chrome compared to Internet Explorer. Nothing to be done about that, it is what it is, but it is frustrating to know that some who view your work won't see it at it's best. Grrrrr! Ok Ok. Here is a repost of an earlier shot, it "should" look right in IE, and at least decent in Chrome now. Let me know. (holds breath) Thanks, Eric HD PENTAX-D FA 150-450mm F4.5-5.6ED DC AW ƒ/7.1 450.0 mm 1/1250 iso1250 Yeah I have a few issues as well; If I start with a raw DNG file in LR, process it to being monochrome and then right click the file and 'Edit in>Photoshop' then photoshop converts the monochrome shot to being colour. Colour and work spaces are the same in both LR and PS.. I dunno what gives, I think I might uninstall both today and do fresh reinstalls. Another anomaly is if I do the above process (LR>Edit in>PS) and then Export in PS as a srgb Jpg the colours are completely off and ruined. I have to hit 'Save' in PS, get the image with the changes applied back to LR and then Export from LR to get colour accuracy fixed. Again no idea why... It's annoying. The funniest thing of all however is when doing paid work for a client. You start off with a studio portrait mug shot at around 40mb DNG file. You then spend 20mins editing, F&S etc etc to end up with a wonderful 20mb Jpg file that makes the subject look 10yrs younger lol. But then somehow... during the exchange of files (direct emails with the full res file as well as download links), the client manages to screw everything up and set up your image to being a measly 50kb pixelated and ruined portrait profile shot on Facebook (LOL!). This is despite also giving 'Facebook Friendly' (2048 longest edge) versions as well... So I have come to the conclusion that you have to let some control go. Different browsers, different screens (some calibrated, some not), etc. In fact I have two screens set up, one is calibrated and the other is not, the other is a bright saturated screen that might display what the image looks like on a lot of joe bloggs phones, so I like to check how the image would look on both screens. Sometimes I think that's what we should be doing, calibrating our screens to match the clients or masses! ha! Anyway... -------------------- This is Rose.

09-26-2019, 04:58 PM	#25526
dbs Pentaxian Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Clare Valley S A Photos: Albums Posts: 7,564	The old ' if you must' look Not looking your way whilst you have one big and one small eye Dave

09-26-2019, 05:24 PM - 2 Likes	#25528
jabobby Loyal Site Supporter Join Date: Mar 2017 Location: north west pennsylvania Photos: Albums Posts: 786	Originally posted by Erictator OK, I'm back... where have I been? Lost in space! Color space that is... Without going too deep into the saga, let's suffice it to say that I flipped Adobe ACR somhow to EsRGB by mistake from sRGB where it had been set for eon's... and it left me chasing my tail. I also found that even if you have your Adobe PhotoShop color space set to sRGB, but your working color space isn't set to force whatever you open in RAW to your Working colorspace and embed it, then you are still screwed. THEN... when I asked for help here, it opened my eyes to another issue I hadn't noticed before... internet browser differences in displaying pics. The same photo hosted on Flickr, even with the correct color space, looks a tad washed out in Chrome compared to Internet Explorer. Nothing to be done about that, it is what it is, but it is frustrating to know that some who view your work won't see it at it's best. Grrrrr! Ok Ok. Here is a repost of an earlier shot, it "should" look right in IE, and at least decent in Chrome now. Let me know. (holds breath) Thanks, Eric HD PENTAX-D FA 150-450mm F4.5-5.6ED DC AW ƒ/7.1 450.0 mm 1/1250 iso1250 First let me say that I agree with what Frederic said so nicely, great to see you back Eric. This photo looks stunning on my calibrated monitor. The previous posts of that shot looked like they were taken in the fog...heavy fog at that. Best Regards, Bob

09-26-2019, 07:47 PM - 2 Likes	#25529
eaglem Site Supporter Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Perth Western Australia Photos: Gallery Posts: 43,150	Nature's contrasts

09-26-2019, 09:24 PM	#25530
BruceBanner Site Supporter Join Date: Dec 2015 Posts: 5,404	Originally posted by OldPentaxFan This was an outdoor concert in the evening so lighting was by stage light only. I think it turned out pretty well for handheld in the back of the audience. Some motion blur but I think it adds to the scene rather than detracts from it. It does, I think the best music, public speaking events etc are best when there is a sense of movement, you just want to have it controlled (which you have). 10/10.