Originally posted by Big Dawg As a young man in the 1960's, I was not able to afford good cameras or lens. Those adds in the photo magazines at the doctor's office were enticing to say the least, but they (cameras and lens) cost so much and were beyond my reach. Then in the late 1970's my wife saved up enough money to buy me a K1000 with a 50mm kit lens and a Sear's brand 135mm tele for Christmas. My dream had come true....partially anyway. There were still all those adds for those exotic (to me anyway) 70-210 zooms and those nice 24mm,28mm and 35mm wide angle lens. I had no idea what a macro was so they didn't matter but those zooms......Man, I dreamed of a zoom!
So I finally in the early 2000's I was able to step up to digital....
Some of my story is similar to yours; I bought a Pentax ME SE when my rangefinder camera was ruined in an exotic incident my then-fiance and I had just before we were married; four years later I bought the Pentax Super Program when the ME SE never quite recovered from getting damp at a later trip to Niagara Falls. However, for many years I had just two lenses, a Pentax-A 50mm and a Vivitar 75-205mm {which I bought with the first holiday bonus I received}. If I were to find the dollars to buy a K-1, I would probably move back to that pattern, at least for now. I still have that 50mm lens; I had to dump the Vivitar lens because of serious fungus, but I did buy a Tamron AdaptAll 60-300mm lens with a KA back, and I would be quite happy to go back to my old patterns {*} using those two lenses if I could just figure out how to raise the cost of a K-1.
{*} My style has been more "Weegee" Fellig ["f/8 and be there"] than artistic, so I've always tended to work at mid-range apertures and the resulting comfortably thick DOFs. Under those conditions, practice with my K-30 convinces me that the Pentax "focus confirmed" signal is more than adequate for my 68-year-old eyes to achieve the manual focus I need.