Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
06-20-2016, 04:40 AM   #16
Lens Buying Addict
monochrome's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kirkwood (St. Louis) MO
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 19,449
K135/2.5 for sharp portraits. K135/3.5 for smaller size (sleeper value at market prices). SMC (K) coatings are slightly warmer than the M coatings. Use the hoods. IME green button metering works well with K lenses. Constant lighting? Lock the camera.

06-20-2016, 04:52 AM   #17
Senior Member
Medex's Avatar

Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 189
lok at this, maybe
https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/10-pentax-slr-lens-discussion/233415-soli...m-f-2-3-a.html
06-20-2016, 05:29 AM   #18
Senior Member




Join Date: Oct 2013
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 264
Only 135mm lens I have is the Carl Zeiss Jena Sonnar 135mm f/3.5 (zebra), but it's pretty nice (and takes the same 49mm filters as so many Pentax lenses). Some samples:
Bird closeups in the yard (uncropped!) -- Penn Station -- Random unprocessed shots around New York City -- First three of these were with the Sonnar and strike me as having a rather "vintage" look -- Dogwood in bloom
06-20-2016, 06:30 AM   #19
Loyal Site Supporter
UncleVanya's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2014
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 9,495
QuoteOriginally posted by Wild Mark Quote
perhaps I can contribute by saying what not to go for (this is a relative statement so don't get too upset with my thoughts)

Suggest avoiding the Takumar Bayonet 135mm f2.5 and, to a lesser extent, super takumar 135mm lenses (these show reduce contrast due to poorer lens coatings).

But, whatever you do, make sure you use a hood on the older glass as flare and contrast loss can feature. Once you use the glass with finesse you will get big rewards.
I'm going to suggest that the Takumar Bayonet might not be a bad idea if you put a hood on it and you are careful. My thinking is that this lenses reduced contrast is subtle and might enhance the vintage look indicated in the original post. In addition, the lens is cheap, readily available and k-mount.

I'm under no delusions about this lens, it is not the cream of the crop, but it may fit the op's needs.

06-20-2016, 06:47 AM   #20
edo
Forum Member
edo's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 75
+1 for the M135 f3.5, lovely lens, compact and light. Very good IQ to boot!
06-20-2016, 07:02 AM   #21
Site Supporter
willdmo's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Stuttgart
Posts: 267
There are tons of 135 mm lenses out there.

for something unique is often the more seldomn ones.

CZJ Sonnar 135 mm has unique rendering and good quality too,

There is a russian sonner version too, the Jupiter 37 (135mm F3.5). It is the same size as the slower Takumar lens, but has a more classical rendering (its a sonnar type)
Due to its many blades the bokeh is always nice too. Just beware, there are 3 versions. the Jupiter 37 is uncoated, the Jupiter 37A is coated, the Jupiter 37AM is multicoated.

Of course there are good ones eswell from other brands., but lesser special.
to hunt down a good 135mm lens is not hard.
in PK the Porst Auto Tele 135mm F2.8 is fine, aswell as its cosina siblings

in M42 you even can get lucky with a Revuenon, Prinz, or to be more sure, with the larger Brands as Mamiya, Yashica, Pentax, Ricoh, Zeiss, Meyer
06-20-2016, 08:14 AM   #22
Loyal Site Supporter
UncleVanya's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2014
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 9,495
There is a nib old stock k135 f2.5 one listed on eBay...
06-20-2016, 01:06 PM   #23
Pentaxian
johnyates's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Saskatoon, SK
Posts: 1,175
I think 135mm is a bit too long for portraiture--unless you have a huge studio, or will be working exclusively outdoors. Back in the day it was 85mm that was considered the ideal focal length.

06-20-2016, 03:14 PM   #24
Pentaxian
mattb123's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Colorado High Country
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 7,031
I have a Leitz (Leica) Elmarit-R 135/2.8 that I adapted to K mount with a Leitax type of mount (eBay knockoff) which replaces the original mount on the lens.
I have only used it a few times and on crop sensors but I'm looking forward to seeing how it does on a K-1. I love the colors it produces and it's built like a tank. They aren't too expensive either.
06-20-2016, 06:35 PM   #25
Senior Member
Big Dawg's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Thach, Alabama
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 165
I like the CZJ 135 f3.5. Not too big and quite sharp.
Attached Images
View Picture EXIF
PENTAX K-7  Photo 
View Picture EXIF
PENTAX K-7  Photo 
View Picture EXIF
PENTAX K-7  Photo 
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
dslr, full frame, full-frame, glass, k-1, k1, lenses, pentax k-1, portraits, shop, style, time
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
To K1 or not K1 - that is the question? interested_observer Pentax K-1 52 06-25-2016 11:05 PM
Got to play with a K1 over the weekend.....Im in trouble now ! Dlanor Sekao Pentax K-1 27 06-08-2016 12:07 PM
Expired Contest Poll VOTE NOW - Photo Contest #109 Poll (Night Time is the Right Time) Ole Monthly Photo Contests 99 10-24-2015 01:25 PM
Now is the time to buy Pentax 645d spotreunion Pentax Medium Format 25 08-21-2015 08:28 PM
Is now the time to buy the K-5? gilby1969 Pentax K-5 8 09-25-2012 04:09 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:22 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top