Originally posted by Dan Rentea As far as I'm concern, something went wrong. Either the problems you had on your shoulder had an impact to final images, either the technique you used, either the post processing was "aggressive"... I don't know what happened because I wasn't there. But take a look at an image I took with K-3 II and DA35mm f2.4 in a hot day. Settings were: 1/5000s, f4, ISO 200 + a massive crop in Lightroom. And yet, I do not have the grain in the sky, nor the lack of details you have in this image.
As I said, I was panning
against the movement of
that plane. Subject-movement was inevitable when using 1/2000. If you want to pixel-peep, look at the plane I was panning
with: the left-to-right plane.
Note the other things I said: I was using the lens at f/5.6, hence stopped down just 2/3-stop; and because I hadn't panned well, the center AF point I was using for focusing was on the sky in most of those "cross" photos.
Yes, I used (very) aggressive post-processing (in Lightroom). For all photos to be shown in DPReview, I use a Develop preset intended to make a typical photo look good in the gallery obtained when clicking on an image in the post. (Have a look). Not to look good when viewing at the original (non-downsized) uploaded size. Don't compare my 1:1 photos with any downsized, hence not 1:1, image. (I'm not sure whether your photos are 1:1).
When I have a serious purpose for my images, such as competitions or international salons, I always use both Lightroom and Photoshop, using 2 or 3 phase sharpening. And I check them by test-printing at A3+ on glossy paper. I don't use a generic aggressive Lightroom preset for them!
As I said: "I think they were doomed not be of competitions quality! I posted them to illustrate that even with the relatively low burst rate of the K-1, it is possible to get several frames with both planes in. (Somewhat to my surprise). Now I've got to get the details right!"