Originally posted by DeadJohn Are the dots more affected by exposure time or by ISO? For example, 15 minutes ISO 100 is a similar exposure to 1 minute ISO 1600. How do the white dots compare *without* LENR?
I find the white dots are much more noticeable with higher ISO's above 400. The longer exposure the more possible and probable they become. Your 1 minute at ISO 1600 may not be as bad as you think however, but it would be something you just need to try. However a 15 minute exposure at 100, might start to show them especially in the shadows.
So far in my astrotracer work, 2 and 3 minute exposures, I do not notice the dots in the sky hardly at all, but again they do show up in the shadows.
If you try pixel shift for 30 seconds at higher ISO's the dots IMO become the worst, won't do that again.
One facet I have noticed, and it's a positive one, is that the dots appear on my K1 only in the dark areas on the longer exposures. Recent example 2 and 3 minutes at 1600, 1200 and 800, (using moonlight for illumination star trail work), the dot only showed up in the shadow/darker areas. This is unlike my Nikon's which got the dots throughout the image.
Long Exposure Noise reduction on my camera removes around 95% to 97% of them, but I mostly don't use it due to the waste of battery life and time. Pentax locks you out of the camera and doesn't run this operation in the background like Canon does.
Remember, Capture One will open any of these problematic files, and remove all of the dots, without any damage to the file, unlike LR or Silkypix or Pentax's software. You need the Pro version of the software.
Paul C