Originally posted by kh1234567890 A year on and I still have no need for a K-1 ...
Same here. Haven't reached the limits of my K-3 yet, except maybe high-ISO-wise, and APS-C with its excellent balance of IQ, convenience, and affordability simply does it for me. And much as I appreciate that Pentax has something to offer in the FF department, I'm rather interested in how the APS-C story will go on, especially at the high end. That said, good glass is more important to me than constant camera upgrades anyway, which means that I tend to skip camera generations before I get a new body, or may wait till that model is well into its production cycle.
The prospect of having to carry around bulkier FF equipment all the time would possibly lead to more situations where I would decide against taking any camera at all, and then in fact I would lose photographic potential instead of gaining it. So, enjoy your K-1's for the remarkable cameras they are, but remember that there is no Holy Grail in photography, or at least people's views on what constitutes it will vary. Which is a good thing IMO.