Originally posted by pakinjapan A bit off-topic but not really! what is it mean when he said:
"Pentax's lenses are hopeless as a lineup—it's the anti-Fuji in terms of the lineup making internal sense."
Can somebody elaborate? I am not familiar with another brand enough to under stand it.
Pentax's lens line up is really that bad? I mean.."Hopeless", really? And by say Anti-Fuji, he means Fuji lenes' lineup made more sense for photographer?
I don't have an issue at all seeing people saying something about Pentax. I could be one of the last person to be branded as a fanboy of anything, but I really wonder about Pentax lense's lineup because this is not the first time I see a comment like this.
I had to read his article to see just what he meant, and it’s not a bad thing.
Fuji has a limited lens line up, high quality and covers pretty much all the focal lengths most would need.
For Pentax, we have decades worth of lenses to chose from and experiment with, the options are hopeless in our 70 years worth of lenses.
As far as current offerings, you’ll hear a lot about the line up being hopeless, that there isn’t enough in the way of modern lenses. But that’s not how he wrote it here.